Update to_s and inspect to have similar signatures accross the stdlib#7528
Merged
bcardiff merged 25 commits intocrystal-lang:masterfrom Mar 14, 2019
Merged
Update to_s and inspect to have similar signatures accross the stdlib#7528bcardiff merged 25 commits intocrystal-lang:masterfrom
to_s and inspect to have similar signatures accross the stdlib#7528bcardiff merged 25 commits intocrystal-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
ghost
reviewed
Mar 8, 2019
Sija
reviewed
Mar 8, 2019
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@Sija and @r00ster91 I have updated the PR what do you think? |
Contributor
|
👍 from me |
Sija
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2019
j8r
reviewed
Mar 11, 2019
Contributor
j8r
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since we are annotating, even this are compiler's internal; there are no docs but this can help debugging.
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: wontruefree <javajax@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@j8r I updated everything with your suggestions. Can you take another look? |
j8r
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2019
Contributor
Author
|
@j8r can you rerun CI for this it looks like the build was canceled? |
Member
|
I cancelled it because there way too many builds in the queue. I've just triggered a rerun. |
bcardiff
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2019
Contributor
Author
|
@bcardiff I just wanted to check in and see if this could get merged? |
asterite
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2019
Member
|
Now that there were two reviews yes. Thanks @wontruefree! |
urde-graven
pushed a commit
to urde-graven/crystal
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2019
* 'master' of github.com:crystal-lang/crystal: Change the font-weight used in Playground (crystal-lang#7552) Fix formatting absolute paths (crystal-lang#7560) Refactor IO::Syscall as IO::Evented (crystal-lang#7505) YAML: fix test checking serialization of slices for libyaml 0.2.2 (crystal-lang#7555) Let Array#sort only use `<=>`, and let `<=>` return `nil` for partial comparability (crystal-lang#6611) Update `to_s` and `inspect` to have similar signatures accross the stdlib (crystal-lang#7528) Fix restriction of valid type vs free vars (crystal-lang#7536) Rewrite macro spec without executing a shell command (crystal-lang#6962) Suggest `next` when trying to break from captured block (crystal-lang#7406) Fix GenericClassType vs GenericClassInstanceType restrictions (crystal-lang#7537) Add human readable formatting for numbers (crystal-lang#6314) Add command and args to execvp error message (crystal-lang#7511) Implement Set#add? method (crystal-lang#7495)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed some differences the signatures of some
to_smethods that take IO. This just adds some types explicitly and changes some of the methods to use the same signature.