Do not consider PENDING state as healthy #1866
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does:
While working on the PR #1818 I've realized that an ingester is considered healthy for read operations while
PENDINGbut not whileJOINING. From my perspective, an ingester shouldn't be considered healthy whilePENDING, so I'm suggesting to:PENDINGstate as healthyIn the read path, there are some API endpoints like
LabelNamesandLabelValuesForLabelNamefor which we query all healthy ingesters (seedistributor.forAllIngesters()). APENDINGingester shouldn't hold any data yet, so shouldn't be required to be hit.A comment I've received in a previous discussion on this topic is that this change may introduce quorum issues during ingesters rollout. However, I can't see a real difference compared to when the ingester switches from
PENDINGtoJOINING, considered that we already consider theJOININGstate as unhealthy.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
No issue
Checklist
CHANGELOG.mdupdated - the order of entries should be[CHANGE],[FEATURE],[ENHANCEMENT],[BUGFIX]