Skip to content

Conversation

@ajeddeloh
Copy link
Contributor

Wellll.... kind of. It's stable enough for other packages to start importing it and using it, just don't use the deprecated fields.

We reserve the right to break the spec until the stable 2.0.0 (Ignition version, not spec version) release, although we do not anticipate any backwards incompatible changes EXCEPT removing deprecated fields.

Copy link
Contributor

@arithx arithx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally LGTM.

Should we just go ahead and drop the deprecated fields from the docs in this PR and then follow up later with the removal of the actual fields?


package config

import (
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: Should we change the commit title to *: stabilize spec 3.0.0?

Andrew Jeddeloh added 3 commits March 25, 2019 14:38
Make 3.0.0-experimental into 3.0.0.
Do not hardcode hashes in test configs. Move the servers to their own
package (to avoid dependency loops) then export the hashes a variable
instead.
Do not hardcode the hashes of fetched configs; instead, use the servers
package to get a calculated one.
@ajeddeloh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed commit message. I'd rather remove the docs when we remove the fields. They're marked deprecated in the spec too, so I'm not too concerned.

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Mar 25, 2019

This looks good to me!

We reserve the right to break the spec until the stable 2.0.0 (Ignition version, not spec version) release

OK that makes sense to me. I think we should have FCOS switch back to git master before that so that folks other than you and me can write 3.0.0 configs and test the mount/umount stuff etc... :)

@ajeddeloh
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we should have FCOS switch back to git master before [we release 2.0.0 stable] so that folks other than you and me can write 3.0.0 configs and test the mount/umount stuff etc... :)

Absolutely

@ajeddeloh ajeddeloh mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2019
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Mar 26, 2019

does this mean, after this lands, we can go ahead and move MCO and other components straight to v3? :)

Copy link
Member

@jlebon jlebon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just realized I hadn't given an official GitHub approval on this!

@jlebon jlebon merged commit b79a5f1 into coreos:master Mar 26, 2019
@bgilbert
Copy link
Contributor

configuration-v3_0-experimental.md wasn't renamed as part of this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants