2.4.x backports#322
Conversation
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( I do have some suggestions for making it better though... For recipe/meta.yaml:
This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/12831901956. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail. |
|
is the GPU server back online or should i start building out? |
The server is back online (I just double-checked this in another PR). It's still only at half the GPU capacity (as throughout December), apparently due to a faulty motherboard that'll need to be replaced. But it should be good enough to build out things. For more time savings, we could merge conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock#6910 |
…onda-forge-pinning 2025.01.16.07.42.23
730cec3 to
5d9f01c
Compare
…onda-forge-pinning 2025.01.16.07.42.23
| cdt_name: # [linux] | ||
| - cos7 # [linux] | ||
| - cos7 # [linux] | ||
| - cos7 # [linux] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Forgot to remove this one with all the recent zip changes... Oh well, not important enough to repush
|
Thanks for addressing the bugs in the build process. I had started a build got through (4-5 of the configs) only to realize that:
I would rather just go all on CPU runners on this maintenance branch. The complexity of these zips is really demotivating me from using them. |
What problem are you running into?
We have very different ways of looking at this. For me it's just a fact of life, and I'm not "using" them, as much as they're part of the ambient fabric of conda-forge. And I'd much rather have an extra entry in the zip (we recently removed |
|
I unfortunately deleted the logs. I’ll have new ones in 24 hours or so. |
|
Looks OK except one failure on aarch+CUDA (IOW, this doesn't reproduce the failure on MKL you saw @hmaarrfk): |
|
It's great to see the CIs again. I think I was seeing memory errors on the tiny machine I used to build things on. So this is new to me |
|
OK, looking around, the problem with |
| c_compiler_version: # [osx] | ||
| - 17 # [osx] | ||
| cxx_compiler_version: # [osx] | ||
| - 17 # [osx] | ||
| llvm_openmp: # [osx] | ||
| - 17 # [osx] | ||
|
|
||
| mkl: | ||
| - 2023 | ||
| libprotobuf: | ||
| - 5.28.2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR is mainly to keep building 2.4 as before. However, we could remove these bits in another PR and see what a rerender brings (there were some issues with clang 18 in the fbgemm submodule, but there have been no changes in that submodule for ~2 years, so no idea what would have changed between 2.4 & 2.5, where we're successfully using clang 18.
|
Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot! I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:
Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day! |
|
I keep forgetting that automerge is not compatible with the open-gpu setup... Anyway, pushed a manual commit to trigger the builds on the |
Checklist
0(if the version changed)conda-smithy(Use the phrase@conda-forge-admin, please rerenderin a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)Backported the fixes to the two bugs reported against 2.4.x. I haven't rerendered, because this forces CUDA 12.6, and I wasn't able to get it to work — the most obvious changes result in build error:
and I'm not sure if it's really worth putting more effort into it at this point.