Skip to content

Another attempt at 3.12.1 bump#85

Merged
isuruf merged 11 commits into
conda-forge:mainfrom
mgorny:3.12.1_hf89c5c
Nov 6, 2025
Merged

Another attempt at 3.12.1 bump#85
isuruf merged 11 commits into
conda-forge:mainfrom
mgorny:3.12.1_hf89c5c

Conversation

@mgorny

@mgorny mgorny commented Nov 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

Basically a rerun of #78 since the logs are gone, with an extra patch and a rerender.

@conda-forge-admin

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

  • ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-recipe-manager. The recipe can only be automatically migrated to the new v1 format if it is parseable by conda-recipe-manager.

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/19148087224. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@mgorny

mgorny commented Nov 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hmm, maybe we should configure it to use -DLAPACK_COMPLEX_CPP instead.

@mgorny mgorny force-pushed the 3.12.1_hf89c5c branch 2 times, most recently from 881e12b to 2efd54e Compare November 6, 2025 16:54
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
…5.11.06.19.20.54

Other tools:
- conda-build 25.9.0
- rattler-build 0.49.0
- rattler-build-conda-compat 1.4.9
@mgorny mgorny marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2025 21:08
@isuruf isuruf merged commit 677c045 into conda-forge:main Nov 6, 2025
9 checks passed
@mgorny mgorny deleted the 3.12.1_hf89c5c branch November 7, 2025 02:20
@mgorny

mgorny commented Nov 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@isuruf, thanks! Could you tell me what you think of the MSVC patch? I'm thinking this is something I could upstream.

@isuruf

isuruf commented Nov 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mgorny

mgorny commented Nov 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Heh, yes. Why didn't I think somebody must have solved it already…

@mgorny

mgorny commented Nov 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Reference-LAPACK/lapack#1164 now. If that works out, we may also want to upstream the DLL patch — but I don't really know the details for it.

@h-vetinari h-vetinari left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just noticed some issues here that will be problematic. I'm going to send a rebuild and mark the existing builds; they're only in lapack_rc with no downloads anyway.

Comment thread recipe/meta.yaml
{% set version = "3.11.0" %}
{% set version = "3.12.1" %}
# if build_num is reset to 0 (for new version), update increment for blas_minor below
{% set build_num = 5 %}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pity that this didn't reset the build number

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uh, sorry about that.

Comment thread recipe/meta.yaml
Comment on lines 8 to 9
# for builds across lapack-versions within the same blas_major
{% set blas_minor = build_num + 200 %}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And disregarded this instruction.

@h-vetinari

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Pushed fix-up 2075aec

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants