Update to v0.22.0

[xylar]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

closes #155

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[xylar]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[xylar]

I would appreciate at least one more set of eyes on:
https://github.com/SciTools/cartopy/blob/v0.22.0/pyproject.toml
to make sure I didn't mess anything up.

It would also be worth discussing if we want to make cartopy-with-* packages with any of the optional dependencies:
https://github.com/SciTools/cartopy/blob/v0.22.0/pyproject.toml#L52-L56
My current inclination is not to do that unless there is demand but it wouldn't be hard.

[xylar]

Source is no longer being included on PyPI as discussed in #155

[xylar]

      LookupError: setuptools-scm was unable to detect version for /home/conda/feedstock_root/build_artifacts/cartopy_1691225778495/work.
      
      Make sure you're either building from a fully intact git repository or PyPI tarballs. Most other sources (such as GitHub's tarballs, a git checkout without the .git folder) don't contain the necessary metadata and will not work.
      
      For example, if you're using pip, instead of https://github.com/user/proj/archive/master.zip use git+https://github.com/user/proj.git#egg=proj
      [end of output]

I will try to remind myself what the workaround for this is but in the meantime I've submitted an issue upstream:
SciTools/cartopy#2228

[xylar]

Scipy is only included as an extra in this version. I'm not sure what ucrt was needed for but I didn't see any mention of it in this release.

[ocefpaf]

It is a universal C runtime and it was added in #116 (comment)

The CIs are passing so I'm OK leaving it out. Hopefully we won't break cartopy for Windows users :-)

[xylar]

@zklaus, you were the one to recommend adding this library. It seemed to make CI pass at the time but doesn't seem to be needed now. I didn't find any mention of it (outside of people listing their environments) upstream: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3ASciTools%2Fcartopy+ucrt&type=issues

Do you think it's okay to remove it at this point?

[akrherz]

IIRC, @zklaus is on holiday this month

[xylar]

Ah, yes. In that case maybe we assume the passing tests are a sign that this is no longer needed? It seemed like the PR where this was added indicated that the Win tests only passed after it was added.

[dopplershift]

I say merge and we can always add it back if someone reports it broken. Better to get this out there.

[dopplershift]

I'll add that cartopy isn't doing anything special here on building (just a bit of Cython at this point), so if it is somehow needed, it really should be something else exporting the requirement.

[xylar]

@conda-forge/cartopy, this is ready for review.

[xylar]

A question is whether we're okay with switching to GitHub for the source as done here or if we want to wait for source to be uploaded to PyPI, see SciTools/cartopy#2228 (comment)

[ocefpaf]

A question is whether we're okay with switching to GitHub for the source as done here or if we want to wait for source to be uploaded to PyPI, see SciTools/cartopy#2228 (comment)

I'm OK moving to GH and even moving back to PyPI after this release. Whatever you feel is easier. The only advantage to PyPI releases is that, some times, they are slimmer than the GH counterparts b/c authors remove some of the "fat."

[xylar]

@ocefpaf, I also feel like bypassing setuptools-scm isn't very clean so I would prefer to see if the source gets pushed to PyPI in the next day or 2 as it seems it might.

[dopplershift]

I just uploaded the sdist to PyPI.

[xylar]

Thanks @dopplershift!

[xylar]

@conda-forge/cartopy, I have moved the source back to pypi and this is again ready for review (assuming tests pass).