[7.0.x] Feature sync with main & upstream #863
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
h-vetinari
force-pushed
the
refresh_7.0
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fe6ada2 to
cc4a865
Compare
h-vetinari
force-pushed
the
refresh_7.0
branch
from
cc4a865 to
98f3bc4
Compare
Member
Author
|
@conda-forge-admin, please rerender |
…nda-forge-pinning 2022.09.13.20.27.40
h-vetinari
requested review from
cpcloud,
jakirkham,
jreback,
kou,
kszucs,
leifwalsh,
nealrichardson and
pcmoritz
as code owners
h-vetinari
requested review from
pearu,
pitrou,
robertnishihara,
siddharthteotia,
wesm and
xhochy
as code owners
kkraus14
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Combination of #853 & #848 for 7.0.x
I double-checked when the features (enabled in 414286b) landed:
However, despite
ARROW_GCSseemingly landing in 9.0, it was enabled here in #677 during the 7.0 cycle.