-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add app_installation functionality to Worker #970
Comments
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Jan 19, 2024
These changes port codecov/codecov-api#346 to the worker so we can use them here as well. context: codecov/engineering-team#970
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
depends on: #236 context: codecov/engineering-team#970 usage of the `GithubAppInstallation` model through the worker. It still respects and doesn't affect deprecated usages of `owner.integration_id` and `repo.using_integration`, but if a ghapp exists for the owner it takes precedence over the legacy fields.
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2024
These changes port codecov/codecov-api#346 to the worker so we can use them here as well. context: codecov/engineering-team#970
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2024
depends on: #236 context: codecov/engineering-team#970 usage of the `GithubAppInstallation` model through the worker. It still respects and doesn't affect deprecated usages of `owner.integration_id` and `repo.using_integration`, but if a ghapp exists for the owner it takes precedence over the legacy fields.
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2024
These changes port codecov/codecov-api#346 to the worker so we can use them here as well. context: codecov/engineering-team#970
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2024
depends on: #236 context: codecov/engineering-team#970 usage of the `GithubAppInstallation` model through the worker. It still respects and doesn't affect deprecated usages of `owner.integration_id` and `repo.using_integration`, but if a ghapp exists for the owner it takes precedence over the legacy fields.
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Jan 29, 2024
These changes port codecov/codecov-api#346 to the worker so we can use them here as well. context: codecov/engineering-team#970
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2024
depends on: #236 context: codecov/engineering-team#970 usage of the `GithubAppInstallation` model through the worker. It still respects and doesn't affect deprecated usages of `owner.integration_id` and `repo.using_integration`, but if a ghapp exists for the owner it takes precedence over the legacy fields.
giovanni-guidini
added a commit
to codecov/worker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2024
depends on: #236 context: codecov/engineering-team#970 usage of the `GithubAppInstallation` model through the worker. It still respects and doesn't affect deprecated usages of `owner.integration_id` and `repo.using_integration`, but if a ghapp exists for the owner it takes precedence over the legacy fields.
@giovanni-guidini @trent-codecov can we move this to closed? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Depends on #969 , create a model in the worker as well.
sync_repos_using_installation()
, change the UPDATE to a SELECTowner.integration_id
andrepo.using_integration
such as this oneintegration_id
toinstallation_id
(exceptgithub.integration.id
incodecov.yml
which is an unrelated thing with the same name)Original context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: