(#37) Implement note rule CPMR0068

[AdmiringWorm]

Description Of Changes

This implements the note rule CPMR0068 that verifies whether the owners
field matches the authors field or not.

This is equivalent to what is implemented in Package Validator, and
should be enhanced in the future.

Motivation and Context

To include as many rules as we can that is implemented by Package Validator.

Testing

1. Create a nuspec file.
2. Update the authors and owners element to have the same value.
3. Run choco pack on the created nuspec file.
4. Verify the rule CPMR0068 is flagged.
5. Change the value in the owners element to something else.
6. Run choco pack on the same nuspec file.
7. Verify the rule CPMR0068 is NOT flagged

Operating Systems Testing

• Windows 10

Change Types Made

• Bug fix (non-breaking change).
• Feature / Enhancement (non-breaking change).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality to change).
• Documentation changes.
• PowerShell code changes.

Change Checklist

• Requires a change to the documentation.
• Documentation has been updated.
• Tests to cover my changes, have been added.
• All new and existing tests passed?
• PowerShell code changes: PowerShell v3 compatibility checked?

Related Issue

Fixes #37

[AdmiringWorm]

It is expected that the GHA build will fail, verify with the internal build instead.

EDIT:

PR #56 should be merged before this one

[gep13]

@AdmiringWorm can you please update the testing steps here? They don't seem to reflect what is actually being implemented within this PR. Could they be a copy/paste from the last PR?

[gep13]

This LGTM, and can be merged, but the test steps need to be updated to match what should actually be tested before we can merge.

[AdmiringWorm]

@AdmiringWorm can you please update the testing steps here? They don't seem to reflect what is actually being implemented within this PR. Could they be a copy/paste from the last PR?

I have updated the testing steps now. And yes, you are right with it being a copy/paste from the last PR.

[gep13]

@AdmiringWorm thanks for getting that updated, and for getting this new rule added!