Conversation
|
Coverage from tests in coverage: 47.9% of statements across all listed packagescoverage: 52.9% of statements in consensus/istanbul coverage: 42.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/announce coverage: 56.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend coverage: 0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/backendtest coverage: 24.3% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/internal/replica coverage: 56.4% of statements in consensus/istanbul/core coverage: 50.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/db coverage: 0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/proxy coverage: 64.4% of statements in consensus/istanbul/uptime coverage: 51.8% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator coverage: 79.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator/randomCommentID: 69b72d95f7 |
Codecov ReportBase: 54.82% // Head: 54.81% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1990 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 54.82% 54.81% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 688 695 +7
Lines 92542 93258 +716
==========================================
+ Hits 50737 51115 +378
- Misses 37993 38300 +307
- Partials 3812 3843 +31
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
gastonponti
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM!
I would add to the PR description that we also commented the ios compilation on circle (to have a better tracking)
Good point, created a tracking issue and mentioned it in the description. |
Description
Upgrading some dependencies - see #1927
Ported ethereum/go-ethereum#24533 and made some extra changes to make things work.
Also this caused problems with the ios build, which was therefor disabled. This is tracked in #2000.
Other changes
Some changes ported from ethereum/go-ethereum#24533 might not have been absolutely necessary (ex. fixing a typo).
Tested
Existing tests
Related issues
Backwards compatibility
According to #24533, the changes are perfectly compatible and affect only non-cgo builds anyway. Looks like celo-blockchain can't build without cgo yet, so this is definitely not going to be an issue.