nix: Try different patch to fix -pie issues#2749
Closed
Conversation
to include the patch we tried in #2542
in #2532 we added a patch related to static building of ocaml packages, submitted to nixpkgs as NixOS/nixpkgs#124498, but it was never merged upstream. Supposedly a patch from NixOS/nixpkgs#135619 fixes it as well (and maybe more properly). So let’s try that!
Contributor
Author
|
Hmm, this change rebuilds half the nixpkgs world. Maybe easier to just wait for NixOS/nixpkgs#135619 to land and reach the release branch, so that we still get to use the upstream cache. |
Contributor
Author
|
Probably obsolete due to #2954 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
in #2532 we added a patch related to static building of ocaml packages,
submitted to nixpkgs as NixOS/nixpkgs#124498,
but it was never merged upstream.
Supposedly a patch from NixOS/nixpkgs#135619
fixes it as well (and maybe more properly). So let’s try that!