Allow non ascii names

[yoyounik]

Describe your changes

Changes made:

1. Validation Logic Update:
   validation.js: Updated nameSchema to allow non-ASCII letters and spaces.
2. Truncation for Long Names:
   Sidebar/index.css: Added CSS rules to truncate long names in the user context menu.

Issue number

Issue Number : #1561 (comment)

Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review:

• I deployed the application locally.
• I have performed a self-review and testing of my code.
• I have included the issue # in the PR.
• I have labelled the PR correctly.
• The issue I am working on is assigned to me.
• I didn't use any hardcoded values (otherwise it will not scale, and will make it difficult to maintain consistency across the application).
• I made sure font sizes, color choices etc are all referenced from the theme.
• My PR is granular and targeted to one specific feature.
• I took a screenshot or a video and attached to this PR if there is a UI change.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces two distinct changes: a CSS styling update for the user context menu and a modification to name validation logic. The CSS change focuses on improving text overflow handling for user names, while the validation update expands the accepted character set for names to support international characters and spaces. Additionally, the dependency version for swagger-ui-express in the server configuration has been updated to allow for minor and patch updates.

Changes

File	Change Summary
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.css	Added CSS rule .user-context-menu .user-name with text overflow handling: white-space: nowrap, overflow: hidden, text-overflow: ellipsis
Client/src/Validation/validation.js	Updated nameSchema regex from ^[A-Za-z]+$ to ^[\p{L} ]+$ to support international characters and spaces in names
Server/package.json	Updated swagger-ui-express dependency version from "5.0.1" to "^5.0.1" to allow for minor and patch updates

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Validation
    participant UI

    User->>Validation: Enter name
    Validation->>Validation: Validate name with new regex
    alt Valid Name
        Validation-->>UI: Allow submission
    else Invalid Name
        Validation-->>UI: Show validation error
    end

Loading

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

• Business value and requirements alignment: This PR addresses issue Name can contain non-ascii letters or space and long names must fit in the user context menu #1561, allowing non-ASCII names and handling long names in the user context menu. This improves the user experience for users with international names and ensures the application can handle long names without breaking the layout.
• Key components modified: The changes affect the user interface (Sidebar) and the validation process (Validation), which are critical components of the application.
• Impact assessment: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which is a significant feature addition. This should be thoroughly tested to ensure it works correctly and does not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.
• System dependencies and integration impacts: The changes affect the user interface (Sidebar) and the validation process (Validation), which are critical components of the application. These changes require careful testing to ensure they do not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

1. Internationalization Support in Name Validation

• Submitted PR Code:

  const nameSchema = joi
    .string()
    .max(50)
    .trim()
    .pattern(/^[\p{L} ]+$/u)
    .messages({
      "string.empty": "Name is required",
      "string.max": "Name must be less than 50 characters long",
      "string.pattern.base": "Name must contain only letters and spaces",
    });

• Analysis:

  • The new regex /^[\p{L} ]+$/u allows for international characters and spaces in names, which is a significant improvement.
  • However, the error message still refers to "letters" only, which is inconsistent with the new validation logic.

• LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:

  const nameSchema = joi
    .string()
    .max(50)
    .trim()
    .pattern(/^[\p{L} ]+$/u)
    .messages({
      "string.empty": "Name is required",
      "string.max": "Name must be less than 50 characters long",
      "string.pattern.base": "Name must contain only letters (from any language) and spaces",
    });

• Improvement rationale:
  • Updating the error message to reflect the new validation logic improves user experience and clarity.
  • This change ensures consistency between the validation logic and the error messages displayed to users.

2. Truncation for Long Names in User Context Menu

• Submitted PR Code:

  .user-context-menu .user-name {
    white-space: nowrap;
    overflow: hidden;
    text-overflow: ellipsis;
  }

• Analysis:

  • The CSS rule added for .user-context-menu .user-name enables text overflow handling for long user names.
  • However, the rule lacks a max-width property, which is necessary for the ellipsis to appear.

• LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:

  .user-context-menu .user-name {
    white-space: nowrap;
    overflow: hidden;
    text-overflow: ellipsis;
    max-width: 200px; /* Adjust based on your design requirements */
  }

• Improvement rationale:
  • Adding a max-width property ensures that the ellipsis appears and prevents the container from expanding indefinitely.
  • This change improves the user interface by preventing long names from breaking the layout.

Cross-cutting Concerns

• Data flow analysis: The changes affect the user interface (Sidebar) and the validation process (Validation), which are critical components of the application. These changes require careful testing to ensure they do not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.
• State management implications: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which is a significant feature addition. This should be thoroughly tested to ensure it works correctly and does not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.
• Error propagation paths: The changes affect the user interface (Sidebar) and the validation process (Validation), which are critical components of the application. These changes require careful testing to ensure they do not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.

Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis

• Complexity analysis: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which is a significant feature addition. This should be thoroughly tested to ensure it works correctly and does not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.
• Performance implications: The changes might have performance implications, especially if the application needs to handle a large number of users with long or international names. Load testing should be conducted to ensure the application can handle the increased complexity without significant performance degradation.
• Memory usage considerations: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which is a significant feature addition. This should be thoroughly tested to ensure it works correctly and does not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.

2.2 Implementation Quality

• Code organization and structure: The changes are well-structured and follow the existing codebase's conventions. However, the PR could benefit from a more descriptive commit message that clearly outlines the changes and their purpose.
• Design patterns usage: The changes follow established design patterns and best practices for internationalization and user interface handling.
• Error handling approach: The changes introduce error handling for long names in the user context menu and update the validation logic to support international characters. However, the error messages should be reviewed and updated to reflect the new validation logic.
• Resource management: The changes do not introduce new resources or significantly impact existing resource management. However, the performance implications of the changes should be considered during testing.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

• Critical Issues

  • Inconsistent error message: The validation error message still refers to "letters" only, which is inconsistent with the new validation logic that allows spaces and international characters.
    • Impact: This inconsistency might confuse users and negatively impact the user experience.
    • Recommendation: Update the error message to reflect the new validation logic, as suggested in the "Code Logic Deep-Dive" section.

• Warnings

  • Lack of max-width in CSS rule: The CSS rule for long names in the user context menu lacks a max-width property, which is necessary for the ellipsis to appear.
    • Potential risks: Without a max-width, the container might expand indefinitely, breaking the layout and potentially causing performance issues.
    • Suggested improvements: Add a max-width property to the CSS rule, as suggested in the "Code Logic Deep-Dive" section.

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

• Maintainability aspects: The changes are well-structured and follow the existing codebase's conventions. However, the PR could benefit from a more descriptive commit message that clearly outlines the changes and their purpose.
• Readability issues: The changes are well-documented and follow best practices for internationalization and user interface handling. However, the error messages should be reviewed and updated to reflect the new validation logic.
• Performance bottlenecks: The changes might have performance implications, especially if the application needs to handle a large number of users with long or international names. Load testing should be conducted to ensure the application can handle the increased complexity without significant performance degradation.

4. Security Assessment

• Authentication/Authorization impacts: The changes do not directly impact authentication or authorization mechanisms. However, they should be reviewed to ensure they do not introduce new security vulnerabilities.
• Data handling concerns: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which might require additional data handling considerations. However, these changes should not introduce new security vulnerabilities if properly implemented.
• Input validation: The changes update the validation logic to support international characters and spaces in names. However, the input validation should be reviewed and tested to ensure it properly handles and sanitizes user input to prevent security vulnerabilities.
• Security best practices: The changes follow established security best practices for internationalization and user interface handling. However, the security implications of the changes should be reviewed and tested to ensure they do not introduce new security vulnerabilities.
• Potential security risks: The changes might introduce new security vulnerabilities if not properly implemented. However, these changes should not introduce new security risks if properly implemented and thoroughly tested.
• Mitigation strategies: The changes should be thoroughly tested to ensure they do not introduce new security vulnerabilities. Additionally, input validation should be reviewed and tested to ensure it properly handles and sanitizes user input.
• Security testing requirements: The changes should be included in the application's security testing suite to ensure they do not introduce new security vulnerabilities.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

• Unit test analysis: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be thoroughly tested using unit tests. However, the existing unit test coverage should be reviewed to ensure it adequately covers the new functionality.
• Integration test requirements: The changes affect the user interface (Sidebar) and the validation process (Validation), which are critical components of the application. Integration tests should be developed to ensure these components work together correctly and do not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.
• Edge cases coverage: The changes should be tested with various Unicode scripts and edge cases, such as names with diacritics, accents, and combining characters. This ensures the application can handle international names correctly and does not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

  // Sample test case for unit testing the name validation
  const validateName = (name) => {
    const { error } = nameSchema.validate(name);
    if (error) {
      throw new Error(error.details[0].message);
    }
  };

  try {
    validateName('María González');
    validateName('José Ángel');
    validateName('Σωκράτης');
    validateName('王小明');
    validateName('राजेश कुमार');
    validateName('محمد علي');
  } catch (error) {
    console.error(error.message);
  }

• Coverage improvements: Review the existing unit test coverage to ensure it adequately covers the new functionality. Develop new unit tests to cover any uncovered functionality.
• Performance testing needs: Conduct load testing to ensure the application can handle the increased complexity without significant performance degradation. This is especially important if the application needs to handle a large number of users with long or international names.
• Test case recommendations: Develop test cases to cover various Unicode scripts and edge cases, such as names with diacritics, accents, and combining characters. This ensures the application can handle international names correctly and does not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

• Documentation updates needed: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be documented to ensure future contributors understand the internationalization support and can build upon it. Additionally, the application's user documentation should be reviewed and updated to reflect the new functionality.
• Long-term maintenance considerations: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be maintained and updated as needed to ensure it continues to function correctly and meets the evolving needs of the user base.
• Technical debt and monitoring requirements: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be monitored to ensure it continues to function correctly and meets the evolving needs of the user base. Additionally, any technical debt introduced by the changes should be addressed and monitored to prevent it from accumulating and negatively impacting the application's performance and maintainability.

7. Deployment & Operations

• Deployment impact and strategy: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be deployed to production environments to ensure users with international names can use the application without issues. The deployment strategy should consider the changes' impact on performance and ensure the application can handle the increased complexity without significant performance degradation.
• Key operational considerations: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be monitored to ensure it continues to function correctly and meets the evolving needs of the user base. Additionally, any operational issues introduced by the changes should be addressed and monitored to prevent them from negatively impacting the application's performance and availability.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

1. Update validation error message: Update the validation error message to reflect the new validation logic that allows spaces and international characters.
2. Add max-width to CSS rule: Add a max-width property to the CSS rule for long names in the user context menu to ensure the ellipsis appears and prevents the container from expanding indefinitely.
3. Review and update error messages: Review and update the error messages to reflect the new validation logic and ensure they are clear and concise.
4. Conduct thorough testing: Conduct thorough testing, including unit tests, integration tests, edge case testing, and load testing, to ensure the changes do not introduce regressions or security vulnerabilities and meet the application's performance requirements.

8.2 Future Considerations

• Technical evolution path: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be maintained and updated as needed to ensure it continues to function correctly and meets the evolving needs of the user base.
• Business capability evolution: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be maintained and updated as needed to ensure it continues to meet the evolving needs of the user base and the business.
• System integration impacts: The changes introduce internationalization to the application, which should be monitored to ensure it continues to function correctly and meets the evolving needs of the user base. Additionally, any integration issues introduced by the changes should be addressed and monitored to prevent them from negatively impacting the application's performance and availability.

---

---

💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

Server/package.json (1)

Line range hint 19-41: Knees weak, arms heavy... let's talk about version consistency! 🍝

I notice we're using a mix of fixed and caret versions across dependencies. While security-critical packages like bcrypt and jsonwebtoken use fixed versions, others use caret. We should establish a consistent versioning strategy.

Consider:

1. Using fixed versions for security-critical dependencies (current approach for bcrypt, jsonwebtoken)
2. Using caret versions for other dependencies
3. Documenting this versioning strategy in the project's contribution guidelines

This will help prevent dependency-related issues from making us nervous, but on the surface we look calm and ready!

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c68bb3d and e551154.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• Server/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• Client/src/Validation/validation.js (1 hunks)
• Server/package.json (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• Client/src/Validation/validation.js

🔇 Additional comments (1)

Server/package.json (1)

39-39: Yo dawg, let's verify this swagger version change! 🍝

The change from fixed version "5.0.1" to "^5.0.1" for swagger-ui-express seems unrelated to the PR's objective of allowing non-ASCII names. Additionally, we should verify the version compatibility and security implications.

Let's check for any known issues with swagger-ui-express versions:

Mom's spaghetti suggests we should also question why this dependency change is included in a PR focused on non-ASCII name support. Consider splitting this into a separate dependency update PR to maintain clear change boundaries.

[gorkem-bwl]

Can you add a video or screenshot here so that we can review that it works @yoyounik ?

You also have to check all relevant items:

• I have performed a self-review and testing of my code.
• I took a screenshot or a video and attached to this PR if there is a UI change.

[yoyounik]

Yes @gorkem-bwl today i will work on this by night and then i will inform you.