fix: make goose reviewer less bad #6154
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tlongwell-block
changed the title
jamadeo
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2025
katzdave
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2025
…icing * 'main' of github.com:block/goose: (35 commits) docs: skills (#6062) fix: add conditional configuration for GOOSE_BIN_DIR in PATH (#5940) Update dependencies to help in Fedora packaging (#5835) fix: make goose reviewer less bad (#6154) docs: create/edit recipe button (#6145) fix(google): Fix 400 Bad Request error with Gemini 3 thought signatures (#6035) fix: we don't need to warn about tool count when in code mode (#6149) deps: upgrade agent-client-protocol to 0.9.0 (#6109) fix(providers): fix for gemini-cli on windows to work around cmd's multiline prompt limitations #5911 (#5966) More slash commands (#5858) fix: MCP UI not rendering due to CallToolResult structure change (#6143) fix: display shell output as static text instead of spinner (#6041) fix : Custom providers with empty API keys show as configured in desktop (#6105) Add .agents/skills and ~/.config/agent/skills to skills discovery paths (#6139) fix: use instructions for system prompt and prompt for user message in subagents (#6121) Fix compaction loop for small models or large input (#5803) feat: Centralize theme management with ThemeContext (#6137) OpenRouter & Xai streaming (#5873) fix: resolve mcp-hermit cleanup path expansion issue (#5953) feat: add goose PR reviewer workflow (#6124) ...
zanesq
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
* 'main' of github.com:block/goose: (28 commits) Clean PR preview sites from gh-pages branch history (#6161) fix: make goose reviewer less sycophantic (#6171) revert /reply to previous behavior (replacing session history) when full conversation provided (#6058) chore: manually update version (#6166) Integrate pricing with canonical model (#6130) Regenerate canonical models when release branch is created. (#6127) fix: use correct parameter name in read_module handler (#6148) docs: blog for code mode MCP (#6126) test: add ACP integration test (#6150) docs: auto download updates (#6163) fix: respect default_enabled value of platform extensions (#6159) docs: skills (#6062) fix: add conditional configuration for GOOSE_BIN_DIR in PATH (#5940) Update dependencies to help in Fedora packaging (#5835) fix: make goose reviewer less bad (#6154) docs: create/edit recipe button (#6145) fix(google): Fix 400 Bad Request error with Gemini 3 thought signatures (#6035) fix: we don't need to warn about tool count when in code mode (#6149) deps: upgrade agent-client-protocol to 0.9.0 (#6109) fix(providers): fix for gemini-cli on windows to work around cmd's multiline prompt limitations #5911 (#5966) ... # Conflicts: # ui/desktop/src/api/sdk.gen.ts # ui/desktop/src/hooks/useAgent.ts
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The reviewer was confidently wrong on a recent PR. Switched to opus and added a 'steel man the implementation' phase so it has to explain why the author chose their approach before finding fault. Since only owners/maintainers can activate this review, costs should be limited even when using opus.