Skip to content

Conversation

@gasolima
Copy link
Contributor

Issue # (if applicable)

Closes #34230

Reason for this change

This field is confusing customers, also make bad experience since it gave them downtime for their application, beside this if there's a deployment failure the ARecord will not rollback and will be deleted forever until the user manually create one, at the moment there's no way to make it rollbackable.

Description of changes

Deprecating property in ARecord construct

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

N/A

Description of how you validated changes

N/A

Checklist

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team July 23, 2025 13:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added bug This issue is a bug. p1 labels Jul 23, 2025
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Jul 23, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(This review is outdated)

@gasolima gasolima added pr-linter/exempt-readme The PR linter will not require README changes pr-linter/exempt-test The PR linter will not require test changes pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes labels Jul 24, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review July 24, 2025 07:58

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member label Jul 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@kumvprat kumvprat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes seem to be pointing out that the property is doing destructive changes

We can add a warning like : here, using Annotations

From the annotations documentation :

The CLI will display the warning when an app is synthesized, or fail if run in --strict mode.

This would provide enough visibility for this property, when it's used

@gasolima gasolima force-pushed the deprecate-delete-existing branch from 0b28f25 to 064cb8f Compare July 29, 2025 10:41
Copy link
Contributor

@kumvprat kumvprat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member label Jul 29, 2025
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 29, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: pull request branch update failed.

The pull request can't be updated.

You should update or rebase your pull request manually. If you do, this pull request will automatically be requeued once the queue conditions match again.
If you think this was a flaky issue, you can requeue the pull request, without updating it, by posting a @mergifyio requeue comment.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 5cf8b06
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 49b2627 into aws:main Jul 30, 2025
20 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

bug This issue is a bug. contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p1 pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes pr-linter/exempt-readme The PR linter will not require README changes pr-linter/exempt-test The PR linter will not require test changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

aws_route53: delete_existing is creating and deleting 2x

4 participants