Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[POC] Ability to define a stack. #1984

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: function-stacks-0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sobolk
Copy link
Member

@sobolk sobolk commented Sep 10, 2024

Problem

Certain usage patterns of functions end up with Caused By: ❌ Deployment failed: Error [ValidationError]: Circular dependency between resources:.

This happens is scenarios where it could have been avoided. Just because we pack all functions into same stack and therefore coupling them together.

Changes

This PR explores an option to have separate defineStack (we could name it as defineResourceGroup as well if we don't want CDK naming, but then could resource group be just a string like in other POC?).

The code using this solution looks like this:

import { defineFunction, defineStack } from '@aws-amplify/backend';

const stack1 = defineStack('awesome-stack1');
const stack2 = defineStack('awesome-stack2');


export const testFunction = defineFunction({scope: stack1});

export const myApiFunction = defineFunction({
  name: 'api-function',
  scope: stack2
});

Validation

There are two test projects used to reproduce the original problem:

  1. test-projects/function-stack-1
  2. test-projects/function-stack-2

Both deployed successfully with new setting.

Checklist

  • If this PR includes a functional change to the runtime behavior of the code, I have added or updated automated test coverage for this change.
  • If this PR requires a change to the Project Architecture README, I have included that update in this PR.
  • If this PR requires a docs update, I have linked to that docs PR above.
  • If this PR modifies E2E tests, makes changes to resource provisioning, or makes SDK calls, I have run the PR checks with the run-e2e label set.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: b6b25e4

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant