Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ACP-77: Update
ConvertSubnetTx
#3397base: implement-acp-77-deactivation
Are you sure you want to change the base?
ACP-77: Update
ConvertSubnetTx
#3397Changes from 24 commits
b22efc6
a32cec5
eb62df7
c358e0b
83d6932
6b7a685
5a6d1b6
d8bdb24
03d56aa
a46ced0
6f64e69
ba45ab7
b2d76fe
9e6b6b1
ca33847
53e621b
ed2be76
831cb6e
f6cf86d
7cea515
dbd320a
39fba65
f6b51c0
ca79f6f
7fe9af9
443f2b5
d49f77b
09c9155
cc9f7ae
f13cf7a
646ce06
c757fac
e64230d
3cac2b2
e39f5c3
232b065
30537a9
51c7c7a
3ebeaba
363e2be
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR does allow the validator to be initially inactive (by having a 0 balance)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than using
signer.Signer
- should we just us thebls.ProofOfPossession
struct? If we were to ever change the format of the BLS key... having the interface may be nice... But it feels a bit weird to use an interface where only one value is valid.