chore: update meetings.json and newsrooom_videos.json #4216
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
asyncapi-bot
requested review from
Mayaleeeee,
akshatnema,
anshgoyalevil,
asyncapi-bot-eve,
derberg and
sambhavgupta0705
as code owners
✅ Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Contributor
WalkthroughThis update adds two new meeting entries to the meetings configuration and introduces a new video entry for a recent AsyncAPI Community WG Meeting. Additionally, a duplicate video entry for a previous meeting is removed. No existing meeting entries are altered or removed. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Website
participant ConfigFiles
User->>Website: Requests meetings or videos
Website->>ConfigFiles: Reads meetings.json and newsroom_videos.json
ConfigFiles-->>Website: Returns updated meeting and video data
Website-->>User: Displays new meetings and latest video
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
asyncapi-bot-eve
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2025
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
config/newsroom_videos.json (1)
2-7: Remove the period at the end of thedescriptionURL
Including the trailing “.” inside the JSON string makes the link resolve to…/issues/1962.which 404s. Move the full-stop outside the string to keep the hyperlink valid.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
config/meetings.json(1 hunks)config/newsroom_videos.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: asyncapi-bot
PR: asyncapi/website#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T12:07:42.211Z
Learning: The following PR commands are supported in the asyncapi/website repository:
- `/please-take-a-look` or `/ptal`: Requests attention from reviewers who haven't reviewed the PR
- `/ready-to-merge` or `/rtm`: Triggers automerge when all conditions are met
- `/do-not-merge` or `/dnm`: Blocks automerge even if all conditions are met
- `/autoupdate` or `/au`: Adds autoupdate label to keep PR in sync with target branch
- `/update` or `/u`: One-time update of PR with latest changes from target branch
Learnt from: akshatnema
PR: asyncapi/website#3265
File: tests/fixtures/toolsObjectData.js:51-52
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T17:35:36.557Z
Learning: When reviewing code in the 'asyncapi/website' repository, akshatnema prefers that I do not provide committable code suggestions.
Learnt from: anshgoyalevil
PR: asyncapi/website#3557
File: scripts/markdown/check-editlinks.js:58-59
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T15:15:00.759Z
Learning: In the AsyncAPI codebase, batch processing operations (like in the Dashboard script and check-editlinks.js) follow a sequential pattern using await in loops, which is the preferred approach for maintaining consistency across the codebase.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: Automerge PR autoapproved by a bot
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - asyncapi-website
- GitHub Check: Header rules - asyncapi-website
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - asyncapi-website
- GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - macos-13
- GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - ubuntu-latest
- GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lighthouse CI
🔇 Additional comments (1)
config/meetings.json (1)
148-161: New entries look consistent and chronologically correct
The two appended items preserve ascending date order, follow the existing schema (properties, ISO 8601 timestamps, banner handling), and include the required calendar / issue links. No discrepancies spotted.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4216 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 22 22
Lines 778 778
Branches 144 144
=========================================
Hits 778 778 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
asyncapi-bot
deleted the
update-meetings/002ac6450760df83394d169aaafa11e119f1df54
branch
anushkaaaaaaaa
pushed a commit
to anushkaaaaaaaa/website
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes