-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
docs: Proposal to support multi-source apps in the UI (#17106) #17108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
1320978
6c3baa3
3fedcac
da58d22
6a9e455
3e602f1
88c2009
a0f800c
45a3303
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ | ||||||||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||||||||
| title: Proposal for support multi-source apps in the UI | ||||||||||||||||
| authors: | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@keithchong" | ||||||||||||||||
| sponsors: | ||||||||||||||||
| - TBD | ||||||||||||||||
| reviewers: | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@alexmt" | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@crenshaw-dev" | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@ishitasequeira" | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@jannfis" | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@rbreeze" | ||||||||||||||||
| approvers: | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@jannfis" | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@alexmt" | ||||||||||||||||
| - "@crenshaw-dev" | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| creation-date: 2024-02-06 | ||||||||||||||||
| last-updated: 2024-02-06 | ||||||||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| # UI Support for Multiple Sources in Applications | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| This is the proposal for the UI changes to support multiple sources for an Application. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Related Issues: | ||||||||||||||||
| * [Proposal: Support multiple sources for an application](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/blob/master/docs/proposals/multiple-sources-for-applications.md) | ||||||||||||||||
| * [Issue for the Proposal: Support multiple sources for an application](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/677) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ## Summary | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| This is a follow-on proposal to supporting Multiple Sources for Applications, but for the UI. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The above [original](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/blob/master/docs/proposals/multiple-sources-for-applications.md#changes-to-ui) ‘core’ proposal deferred | ||||||||||||||||
| any design changes for the UI to a separate feature or secondary proposal. The proposal implementation that was made in [PR 10432](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/pull/10432) | ||||||||||||||||
| enabled the UI to tolerate multi-source applications with the new Sources field, while still supporting the original Source field. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Here are the current restrictions and limitations of the UI when applications with multiple sources are used: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| 1. The application’s details page (for [example](https://cd.apps.argoproj.io/applications/argocd/guestbook?view=tree&node=argoproj.io%2FApplication%2Fargocd%2Fguestbook%2F0&resource=)) | ||||||||||||||||
| currently shows one ApplicationSource, regardless of whether the application has one source or multiple sources. With the PR 10432 implementation, if the application has multiple sources, | ||||||||||||||||
| the UI displays only the first of the sources. Also, in particular, in the Summary tab, the source parameters are non-editable. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| 2. History and Rollback is disabled for multi-source applications. The button is disabled. Jorge has submitted a PR for | ||||||||||||||||
| rollback which includes [controller and UI changes](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/pull/14124). | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| <img height="40%" width="40%" src="images/history-and-rollback-button.png"/> | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| 3. The New Application dialog currently only allows users to provide one source. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Thus, multiple source applications are not considered first class citizens in the UI. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Note, see the [Open Questions](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/docs/proposals/multiple-sources-for-applications-ui.md#open-questions) | ||||||||||||||||
| section for concerns regarding the priority or value of some of the above changes. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ## Motivation | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The motivation behind this change is to add a more complete story for the multiple source feature. The UI should support | ||||||||||||||||
| the creation of multiple source applications, and also support the viewing and editing of parameters from all sources. The three | ||||||||||||||||
| points in the summary above are the base or core changes that need to be addressed. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### Goals | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The goals of the proposal are: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| - Provide first-class support of multiple sources for applications in the UI (e.g. address the aforementioned restrictions) | ||||||||||||||||
| - Outline stages of implementation that will help ease PR review, and reduce the risk of introducing regressions/issues. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### Non-goals | ||||||||||||||||
| * The design changes for the Argo CD CLI is beyond the scope of this proposal (The server APIs can probably be reused) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ## Proposal | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| As mentioned in the previous summary section, the application source parameters are surfaced in the UI in three locations. | ||||||||||||||||
| The Resource details pages, specifically, the Summary and Parameters tabs, the deployment history, and the Application | ||||||||||||||||
| Create panel page. These pages should be updated. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### Resource Details | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The following describes the current behavior and proposed changes for the Summary tab and the Parameters Tab. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| #### i) Summary Tab | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| _Current Behavior:_ | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The current Summary tab includes source-related information, including the repository. For example, in Figure 1 below, | ||||||||||||||||
| the REPO URL and PATH. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| <img height="50%" width="50%" src="images/current-summary-tab.png"/> | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Figure 1: The current Summary tab | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| _Proposed Change:_ | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| To support multiple sources, the source-related information, from a single-source-based design, will be ‘pulled out’ | ||||||||||||||||
| and put into a new tab called **Sources**, and it will be combined with the **Parameters** tab (more details following). | ||||||||||||||||
| The new **Sources** tab will allow users to view all the information related to each source, including the repo URL | ||||||||||||||||
| and path, chart and revision for Helm, etc. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The view should show one source at a time (similar to what the UI is doing now, which only shows one source), but with | ||||||||||||||||
| widgets to allow users to cycle (via pagination or combo selector?) through each source. There are API calls to retrieve | ||||||||||||||||
| the data for each source. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+101
to
+103
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Just to clarify the proposal based on what was discussed above, does this make sense?
Suggested change
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks @agaudreault . Looks good. Just one comment about pagination with 3 items per page. The paginate component has hardcoded values, with 5 items per page as the minimum, then, 10, 15, 20 and All, as choices. How about keeping it at 5 items per page as the minimum, because if we add 3 as a choice (as the simplest change, and ignoring an enhancement to provide custom values), it will change all the pages that use this paginate component.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Regarding the comment "There are API calls to retrieve the data for each source": I looked into this some more and I think for better performance and usability, it should load the source details 'on demand' when the source section is expanded. Like this:
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. LGTM, I thought the default could have been configurable easily. I like the async loading, I was expecting the data to be already fetched, because it is part of the Application Manifest information, but if it needs to load something, async is definitely my preference. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| <img height="50%" width="50%" src="images/new-sources-tab.png"/> | ||||||||||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not a huge fan of this specific rendering.
How many are likely? Just 3, or are 10, and 100 conceivable/likely?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hi @jsoref, I think there will be advantages and disadvantages as well. In the appendix, I talked about collapsible cards where each card houses the source/input parameters. But it can get unwieldy if we try to support N-number of sources. Maybe it could end up being a combination of collapsible cards and pagination. Note that there is some time required to load the source details. So potentially, we can defer loading until the page is turned. If all cards are in the one tab, then all sources need to be loaded. From what I was told, from the original multi-source proposal, they discussed 10 sources. But don't know what users will do.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yep, I agree. Good to see what scenarios there are and what people suggest. The Argo CD UI doesn't really have a 'representation' like that right now...I think. The closest thing I think is the list view of applications (and also the details list view of an application). The Applications cards represent the Source cards, but they need to be expandable and collapsible. The delete action will be on each card. And the New Source action will be at the top somewhere above the top card. So maybe for consistency, this is the way to go? I don't think it will take much effort to get this up and running. Yeah, I agree that the IntelliJ (and also the VSCode) vertical view on the left is good, but this change will be more involved.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think it would be difficult to add enough information about the sources in the vertical view without making each item a bigger block with multiple fields. It might be good to have 10 sources per page and a collapsible card / pop-up modal for each source.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's not bad -- although it's kinda hard to read. Could you give it a ring and opacity or something so it's easier to see?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is what I was referring to, where if you change the repo URL, or simply change the path within the repo, the input parameters and even the source type can change. So it's probably better to keep these values as separate sections. So perhaps we will need two Edit buttons, like in the screenshot below? As mentioned, for single source apps, these fields are shown in the Summary section, under a different editable section. If you change the values there, the parameters tab will be updated once you visit the tab.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hmmm... Yeah, I think it makes sense to have two edit buttons because they're really very unrelated things
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The initial PR changes for 'read-only' mode is here. #17275. A lot of it is refactoring. I think we can make more progress from these changes. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Figure 2. The new SOURCES tab will allow access to view all sources and application parameters. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| #### ii) Parameters Tab | ||||||||||||||||
| _Current Behavior:_ | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The Parameters tab shows the application parameters for the application’s repository details type or source. These can | ||||||||||||||||
| be Helm, Kustomize, Directory or Plugin (CMP). | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| _Proposed Change:_ | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The Parameter tab will be removed but the contents of the current parameters tab will be ‘reused’ and will be shown in | ||||||||||||||||
| the new **SOURCES** tab as described above. The parameters and parameter values will be shown for whatever source is | ||||||||||||||||
| selected by the user. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| #### iii) Update/Edit Capability in the New Sources Tab | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The above points describe how all the sources will be rendered. However, the Sources tab should be the page to allow | ||||||||||||||||
| users to delete and add sources. (You can currently change the repo URL and path from the Summary tab, or manually edit | ||||||||||||||||
| the application by hand, in the Manifest tab, but this is not considered as ‘guided’ editing.) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| _Current Behavior:_ | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The current form-based UI doesn’t support deleting a chosen/desired source of a multi-source application. It, | ||||||||||||||||
| obviously, does not support deleting the only source in a single-source application. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| _Proposed Change:_ | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| In addition to adding the new SOURCES tab from section i) and ii), two new buttons (_Add Source_ and _Delete Source_) will | ||||||||||||||||
| be added to the page. For the _Add Source_ button, a separate dialog/panel will need to appear to allow the user to | ||||||||||||||||
| input the parameters or other information. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Validation of any newly added source should prevent users from adding the same resource, and prevent users from | ||||||||||||||||
| deleting all sources, etc. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### History and Rollback | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Current Behavior: The History and Rollback button for multi-source apps is disabled. It's only enabled | ||||||||||||||||
| for single-source apps, and shows source information as shown in Figure 3. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| <img height="50%" width="50%" src="images/history-rollback-contents.png"/> | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Figure 3: Source information in History | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Jorge has submitted a [PR](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/pull/14124) for rollback which includes controller and UI changes. | ||||||||||||||||
| This can be treated as a separate, independent proposal. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Other related changes pertain to the Last Synced Details. The Sync Details panel needs to be updated to show sync info | ||||||||||||||||
ashutosh16 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||||||||||
| from multiple sources. See [Issue 13215](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/13215). | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### New App Dialog | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| _Current Behavior:_ | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The dialog currently allows users to ‘quickly’ create a single source application.. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| _Proposed Changes:_ | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Make the form view of the dialog support adding, updating and viewing of multiple sources. The issue with the current | ||||||||||||||||
| single source New App wizard is that it can lead to loss of “input” provided by the user. The content in the form-based | ||||||||||||||||
| editor and the YAML editor (accessed via the Edit as YAML button) must match. If the user provides multiple sources in | ||||||||||||||||
| the YAML editor, and then switches back to the form view, the form will only show the first source. The other sources | ||||||||||||||||
| are effectively ‘lost’. Furthermore, if the user switches back to the YAML editor, only one source will be shown as well. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The design and changes (React components) from the new Sources tab can likely be reused in this dialog. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Other Changes. This includes the underlying plumbing to create an app using the Sources field of the Application CR, so that the | ||||||||||||||||
| deprecated Source field can be removed in the future. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### Use cases | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The use cases involves those areas in the UI where the current source is displayed. These have been described | ||||||||||||||||
| in the Summary and Proposal sections. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### Implementation Details | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| The implementation plan can be divided into different stages. Read-only capability can be provided first and it will | ||||||||||||||||
| be the safest change. The UI currently is not showing all the sources for the multi-source application so this should | ||||||||||||||||
| be the highest priority. (Before you can edit, you have to first display it.) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Here are the general enhancements to be implemented (Upstream issues to be opened if not already): | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| 1. Create new Sources tab to replace Parameters tab so that all sources can be displayed (Read-only) | ||||||||||||||||
| 2. Update History and Rollback to show a summary of all sources of an application | ||||||||||||||||
| As mentioned above, this is already covered by Jorge’s [PR](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/pull/14124) | ||||||||||||||||
| 3. Add _Add Source_ and _Delete Source_ buttons to Sources tab. This will depend on #1 above. (Update and Delete) | ||||||||||||||||
| 4. Update New App dialog. (Creation) | ||||||||||||||||
| - Support adding multiple sources in New App dialog. (This will likely depend on the Components from #1 and #3) | ||||||||||||||||
| - Use Sources field instead of Source field. Clean up code. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### Security Considerations | ||||||||||||||||
| None | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### Risks and Mitigations | ||||||||||||||||
| None | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ### Upgrade / Downgrade Strategy | ||||||||||||||||
| If downgraded, the UI will revert to showing just the first source. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ## Drawbacks | ||||||||||||||||
| None | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ## Open Questions | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Supporting multiple sources in the New App dialog may not be ‘worth’ the effort? The drawback is that switching from the | ||||||||||||||||
| YAML editor and form editor can lead to loss of information. | ||||||||||||||||
keithchong marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Users can simply edit the application manifest to add their sources by hand. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| ## Appendix | ||||||||||||||||
| Multiple sources can be shown as a list of collapsible cards or sections, one below the other, under one page of the | ||||||||||||||||
| SOURCES tab. However, this can be cumbersome especially when a source, like Helm, has many source parameters. | ||||||||||||||||
| so it'll be difficult to find the desired source. Perhaps showing one source per page will be better. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Appendix Figure 1: Zoomed out view of the Helm source parameter list | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| <img height="50%" width="50%" src="images/helm-parameter-list.png"/> | ||||||||||||||||





Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.