Skip to content

fix: fix oracle spec#38435

Merged
sagar-qa007 merged 1 commit intoreleasefrom
fix/oraclespec
Jan 1, 2025
Merged

fix: fix oracle spec#38435
sagar-qa007 merged 1 commit intoreleasefrom
fix/oraclespec

Conversation

@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 commented Jan 1, 2025

Description

Issue with oracle spec in hosted version of ci.

Fixes # https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/stability-pod-6690c4814e31602e25cab7fd/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/38434

Success RUN: https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/all-runs-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ede?branch=master

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12566791033
Commit: 3283b4d
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Sanity
Spec:


Wed, 01 Jan 2025 07:26:18 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced Oracle data source test suite with improved query validation
    • Refined SQL query formatting and test case structure
    • Simplified application deployment process in test scenarios

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 1, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on enhancing the Oracle data source test suite in Cypress. The changes involve updating the test structure, improving SQL query formatting, and simplifying deployment logic. A new PluginActionForm instance is introduced, and the test cases are refined to provide more robust validation of Oracle data source interactions and query executions.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/Datasources/Oracle_Spec.ts - Added PluginActionForm import
- Created new pluginActionForm instance
- Reformatted SQL query structures
- Simplified deployment method calls
- Enhanced test assertions
- Removed after hook for data source deletion

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Bug, ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • ApekshaBhosale
  • NandanAnantharamu

Poem

🔍 In Oracle's digital realm so bright,
Cypress tests dance with newfound might
Queries refined, assertions clear
Code quality leaps without a fear
Testing magic, line by line! 🧪✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Jan 1, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Bug Something isn't working label Jan 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/Datasources/Oracle_Spec.ts (3)

151-161: Check labeling consistency in source data
Using properties "name", "value", "code" can be confusing if not standardized. Confirm uniform usage across the code for clarity.


345-349: Consider using data- attributes for deployment actions*
While the code calls deployMode.DeployApp() and other methods, any reliance on plain text for buttons like "Submit" might be more robust if replaced by data-based locators.


482-492: Confirmation flow
Properly tests the confirmation dialog with “No” response. Consider referencing a data attribute for the button to avoid plain text usage.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8cd8277 and 3283b4d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/Datasources/Oracle_Spec.ts (10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/Datasources/Oracle_Spec.ts (1)

Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/Datasources/Oracle_Spec.ts (8)

22-23: New import for PluginActionForm is appropriate
This import clearly complements the subsequent usage of PluginActionForm.


24-24: Initialize the form instance consistently
The variable name pluginActionForm seems clear. Ensure naming consistency across the codebase if similar patterns exist.


189-199: Table creation logic looks correct
Everything appears valid for the test scenario. No immediate issues identified.


250-274: Multi-line insert statements
They align well with Oracle syntax and appear consistent with the test approach.


369-380: Conditional UPDATE suits the test
No syntax issues found. Good job demonstrating distinct conditions.


390-395: Re-deploy approach
Refreshing the page before redeployment can be beneficial for stability. No concerns here.


Line range hint 409-438: DELETE query looks comprehensive
The multi-condition WHERE clause and subsequent validation steps are appropriate for the test scenario.


470-477: Toggling settings and removing on-page load run
This follows Cypress best practices. Good job disabling unnecessary auto-runs that can complicate testing.

Copy link
Contributor

@NandanAnantharamu NandanAnantharamu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 merged commit 463c119 into release Jan 1, 2025
@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 deleted the fix/oraclespec branch January 1, 2025 10:01
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 1, 2025
2 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2025
2 tasks
github-actions bot pushed a commit to Zeral-Zhang/appsmith that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
## Description
Issue with oracle spec in hosted version of ci.


Fixes #
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/stability-pod-6690c4814e31602e25cab7fd/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/38434

Success RUN:
https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/all-runs-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ede?branch=master

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12566791033>
> Commit: 3283b4d
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12566791033&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Sanity`
> Spec:
> <hr>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 07:26:18 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Tests**
	- Enhanced Oracle data source test suite with improved query validation
	- Refined SQL query formatting and test case structure
	- Simplified application deployment process in test scenarios

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug Something isn't working ok-to-test Required label for CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants