Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove git release feature flags #30962

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

brayn003
Copy link
Contributor

@brayn003 brayn003 commented Feb 7, 2024

Description

Removes git related feature flags

  • release_git_connct_v2_enabled
  • release_git_status_lite_enabled

PR fixes following issue(s)

Fixes #30961 and #30954

Media

Type of change

  • Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)

Testing

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
Delete anything that is not relevant

  • Manual
  • JUnit
  • Jest
  • Cypress

Test Plan

Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR

Issues raised during DP testing

Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR)

Checklist:

Dev activity

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • PR is being merged under a feature flag

QA activity:

  • Speedbreak features have been covered
  • Test plan covers all impacted features and areas of interest
  • Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members
  • Manually tested functionality on DP
  • We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2
  • Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
  • Added Test Plan Approved label after Cypress tests were reviewed
  • Added Test Plan Approved label after JUnit tests were reviewed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced Git synchronization features including better handling of workspace creation, DSL additions, and branch protection settings.
  • Refactor
    • Updated Git connection methods and deployment processes for improved efficiency and reliability.
    • Introduced new variables and methods for more precise control over Git settings and operations.
  • Tests
    • Added and refactored Cypress end-to-end tests to validate new Git functionalities and synchronization processes.
  • Style
    • Updated components to include data-testId attributes for improved testability.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Task A simple Todo skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog labels Feb 7, 2024
@appsmithorg appsmithorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 7, 2024
@appsmithorg appsmithorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 7, 2024
@appsmithorg appsmithorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 7, 2024
@appsmithorg appsmithorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 7, 2024
@appsmithorg appsmithorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 7, 2024
@appsmithorg appsmithorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 7, 2024
@brayn003
Copy link
Contributor Author

brayn003 commented Feb 7, 2024

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Whoa, @tag.All spotted in your test suite! 🚀
While @tag.All is cool, like a catch-all net, why not try specific tags? 🏷️
Narrow down your suite with specific tags for quicker and more accurate tests! 🚀 Less waiting, more zipping through tests like a ninja!
Explore the tags documentation here

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7812931313.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Tags: ``.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7812931313.
Commit: ``.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:

  1. cypress/e2e/Regression/Apps/EchoApiCMS_spec.js

  2. cypress/e2e/Regression/Apps/MongoDBShoppingCart_spec.ts
  3. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/BugTests/GitBugs_Spec.ts
  4. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/ExplorerTests/JSEditorContextMenu_Spec.ts
  5. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitImport/GitImport_spec.js
  6. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitImport/ImportEmptyRepo_spec.js
  7. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/Connection_spec.js
  8. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/DeleteBranch_spec.js
  9. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/Deploy_spec.js
  10. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/DisconnectGit_spec.js
  11. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/GitBugs_spec.js
  12. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/LearnMore_spec.ts
  13. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/MergeViaRemote_spec.ts
  14. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/Merge_spec.js
  15. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/PreconnectionAppNameDeployMenu_spec.ts
  16. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/RegenerateSSHKey_spec.js
  17. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/SwitchBranches_spec.js
  18. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitWithJSLibrary/GitwithCustomJSLibrary_spec.js
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

@brayn003
Copy link
Contributor Author

brayn003 commented Feb 7, 2024

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Whoa, @tag.All spotted in your test suite! 🚀
While @tag.All is cool, like a catch-all net, why not try specific tags? 🏷️
Narrow down your suite with specific tags for quicker and more accurate tests! 🚀 Less waiting, more zipping through tests like a ninja!
Explore the tags documentation here

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7815136072.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Tags: ``.

This comment was marked as outdated.

@brayn003
Copy link
Contributor Author

brayn003 commented Feb 8, 2024

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Whoa, @tag.All spotted in your test suite! 🚀
While @tag.All is cool, like a catch-all net, why not try specific tags? 🏷️
Narrow down your suite with specific tags for quicker and more accurate tests! 🚀 Less waiting, more zipping through tests like a ninja!
Explore the tags documentation here

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7828601472.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Tags: ``.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7828601472.
Commit: ``.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:

  1. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitImport/GitImport_spec.js

  2. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/DeleteBranch_spec.js
  3. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/GitBugs_spec.js
  4. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/ListV2/ListV2_PageNo_PageSize_spec.js
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

@brayn003
Copy link
Contributor Author

brayn003 commented Feb 8, 2024

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Whoa, @tag.All spotted in your test suite! 🚀
While @tag.All is cool, like a catch-all net, why not try specific tags? 🏷️
Narrow down your suite with specific tags for quicker and more accurate tests! 🚀 Less waiting, more zipping through tests like a ninja!
Explore the tags documentation here

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7830000154.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Tags: ``.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7830000154.
Commit: ``.
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!
It seems like no tests ran 😔. We are not able to recognize it, please check workflow here.

@brayn003
Copy link
Contributor Author

brayn003 commented Feb 8, 2024

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Whoa, @tag.All spotted in your test suite! 🚀
While @tag.All is cool, like a catch-all net, why not try specific tags? 🏷️
Narrow down your suite with specific tags for quicker and more accurate tests! 🚀 Less waiting, more zipping through tests like a ninja!
Explore the tags documentation here

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7830170850.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Tags: ``.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7830170850.
Commit: ``.
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!
It seems like no tests ran 😔. We are not able to recognize it, please check workflow here.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7830170850.
Commit: ``.
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!
All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉

@trishaanand trishaanand merged commit 5c74768 into release Feb 9, 2024
18 checks passed
@trishaanand trishaanand deleted the fix/remove-git-feature-flags branch February 9, 2024 04:52
brayn003 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2024
## Description
Removes git related feature flags
- `release_git_connct_v2_enabled`
- `release_git_status_lite_enabled`

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30961

#### Media

#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced Git synchronization features including better handling of
workspace creation, DSL additions, and branch protection settings.
- **Refactor**
- Updated Git connection methods and deployment processes for improved
efficiency and reliability.
- Introduced new variables and methods for more precise control over Git
settings and operations.
- **Tests**
- Added and refactored Cypress end-to-end tests to validate new Git
functionalities and synchronization processes.
- **Style**
- Updated components to include `data-testId` attributes for improved
testability.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
sondermanish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
## Description
Removes git related feature flags
- `release_git_connct_v2_enabled`
- `release_git_status_lite_enabled`

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30961

#### Media

#### Type of change
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced Git synchronization features including better handling of
workspace creation, DSL additions, and branch protection settings.
- **Refactor**
- Updated Git connection methods and deployment processes for improved
efficiency and reliability.
- Introduced new variables and methods for more precise control over Git
settings and operations.
- **Tests**
- Added and refactored Cypress end-to-end tests to validate new Git
functionalities and synchronization processes.
- **Style**
- Updated components to include `data-testId` attributes for improved
testability.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Task A simple Todo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Task]: Remove git release feature flags
5 participants