[Task]: Remove dead code of welcome tour #30332
Assignees
Labels
IDE Navigation
Issues/feature requests related to IDE navigation, and context switching
IDE Pod
Issues that new developers face while exploring the IDE
IDE Product
Issues related to the IDE Product
Comments
albinAppsmith
added
the
IDE Pod
github-actions
bot
removed
the
IDE Pod
albinAppsmith
added
IDE Pod
hetunandu
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2024
## Description Removed the guided tour code. #### PR fixes following issue(s) Fixes #30332 #### Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception) ## Testing > #### How Has This Been Tested? > Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration. > Delete anything that is not relevant - [ ] Manual - [ ] JUnit - [ ] Jest - [ ] Cypress > > #### Test Plan > Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR > > #### Issues raised during DP testing > Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR) > > > ## Checklist: #### Dev activity - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag #### QA activity: - [ ] [Speedbreak features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-) have been covered - [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-) - [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members - [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP - [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2 - [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed - [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Streamlined onboarding process by removing guided tour features. - Refined action and message management for a more intuitive user experience. - Enhanced property controls generation for better user interaction. - **Refactor** - Simplified various components by removing unnecessary guided tour logic. - Improved application and page sagas for more efficient operation. - Refined editor components for a smoother user interface. - **Documentation** - Updated message constants for clearer user guidance. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: