Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix dependabot nanoid issue #1515

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

avzz-19
Copy link
Contributor

@avzz-19 avzz-19 commented Jan 7, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updates to the package.json file, specifically in the devDependencies section. The version of netlify-cli has been upgraded from ^17.37.2 to ^18.0.0, and the version of postcss has been updated from ^8.4.39 to ^8.4.49. These changes reflect an upgrade in the specified versions of these packages.

Changes

File Changes
package.json - Updated netlify-cli from ^17.37.2 to ^18.0.0
- Updated postcss from ^8.4.39 to ^8.4.49

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
Upgrading our tools, as happy as can be!
Netlify and PostCSS, fresh and bright,
New versions to guide us, oh what a sight!
A rabbit's joy in each little change,
Hopping through code, it's never too strange! 🌼✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf7a076 and f7ee10e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Publish to Cloudflare Pages
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Application
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 598e261 and bf7a076.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: Run E2E Tests (5)
  • GitHub Check: Run E2E Tests (4)
  • GitHub Check: Run E2E Tests (3)
  • GitHub Check: Run E2E Tests (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run E2E Tests (1)
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Application
  • GitHub Check: Publish to Cloudflare Pages
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Application
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)

177-177: Verify postcss update compatibility.

The postcss update (8.4.39 → 8.4.49) is a patch version bump which should maintain backward compatibility.

Let's verify there are no breaking changes or security issues:

✅ Verification successful

PostCSS update is safe and compatible

The update from 8.4.39 to 8.4.49 is a patch version change that maintains backward compatibility. Both versions are well above the latest security patch (8.4.31), and there are no known vulnerabilities affecting either version.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check postcss changelog and security advisories

# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "postcss") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 1435


175-175: Verify breaking changes in netlify-cli v18.

The major version bump (17.x → 18.x) may introduce breaking changes that could affect your deployment workflow.

Let's check the changelog and any potential breaking changes:

✅ Verification successful

Breaking changes in netlify-cli v18 are safe to adopt.

The update removes two deprecated features (addons and large media subcommands) but doesn't affect core deployment functionality. This version includes a fix for the nanoid dependency issue mentioned in the PR title (see netlify/cli#6982).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check netlify-cli changelog and dependencies
# Get the latest release notes and check if nanoid is a dependency

# Check if nanoid is a dependency of netlify-cli
npm view [email protected] dependencies --json | jq '.' 

# Get the changelog
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/netlify/cli/main/CHANGELOG.md | head -n 50

Length of output: 6878

package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Deploying irenestaging with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: f7ee10e
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://4590ae4c.irenestaging.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://update-netlify-version.irenestaging.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link

cypress bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Irene    Run #562

Run Properties:  status check failed Failed #562  •  git commit 6ef449dc26 ℹ️: Merge bf7a07688210f0d5407284f4c2558390a22737e5 into 598e261ffaf2224873ee4da63282...
Project Irene
Branch Review update-netlify-version
Run status status check failed Failed #562
Run duration 05m 08s
Commit git commit 6ef449dc26 ℹ️: Merge bf7a07688210f0d5407284f4c2558390a22737e5 into 598e261ffaf2224873ee4da63282...
Committer Avi Shah
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 1
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 31
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Tests for review

Failed  cypress/tests/dynamic-scan.spec.ts • 1 failed test

View Output

Test Artifacts
Dynamic Scan > it tests dynamic scan for an ipa file: 58061 Test Replay Screenshots

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant