Conversation
Removed docs CODEOWNER for the changesets directory.
Contributor
✅ Docs preview has no changesThe preview was not built because there were no changes. Build ID: 1cdb6e019708710916b2996d |
Contributor
|
@abernix, please consider creating a changeset entry in |
carodewig
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removed docs CODEOWNER for the
.changesets/directory.The docs team doesn't really need to review our release changesets at this point, even if that made sense at a previous time.
Without removing this though, we effectively can't merge any PR that adds a changeset without a docs team review. Getting the docs team involved on every changeset will easily bottleneck our PR merges, which I don't think we want. The thing which materially has changed is that we do actually require codeowners reviews as a merge requirement now, which wasn't the case before.
Motivated by #8845