-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
ZEPPELIN-157: Adding Map Visualization for Zeppelin #152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Madhuka
commented
Jul 12, 2015
- Listing Map charting Libraries
- Checking compatible license
- Adding chart library (leafletjs)
- Adding new button for chart mapping
- Loading GIS Mapp in Zeppelin
- Removing the setting for mapping chart
- Adding sample data set (loading)
- Get the sample GIS data and read it
- Add it as in tutorail, where it can be run from the clean environment
- Generalization data validation model
- Add 'validator' for the Map graph input format as service
- Test for this
|
Hi @Madhuka.... thanks for you contributions |
|
Thanks, Yes, I will make it dynamic |
|
Due to -len it is breaking |
f4aaa1c to
cd15db8
Compare
|
In Data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rowCheck returns a boolean, however you never use its output. is it a bug?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed,
with setError()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure how it addresses the issue. Could you elaborate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Madhuka?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@felixcheung :
With updated code basicCheck[1] function return bool and and it is used in checkData()[2].
rowCheck() do not return any bool at now. When ever you found validator issue you can call new function setError();. It will handle it by making errorStatus to true. I will added this function for documentation too. So I will be easy for new developers who will writting new data valitors.
[1] https://github.com/Madhuka/incubator-zeppelin/blob/milestone05-map/zeppelin-web/src/components/data-validator/data-validator-factory.js#L59
[2] https://github.com/Madhuka/incubator-zeppelin/blob/milestone05-map/zeppelin-web/src/components/data-validator/data-validator-factory.js#L32
e27b6b6 to
9a5ce12
Compare
ff727b8 to
d1a0ef0
Compare
|
I don't think you missed anything if you have built it correctly. Please clear the browser cache. |
|
Cool that did the trick. Try the following code: The data output of this one have only one column - name but when I press On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM madhuka [email protected] wrote:
|
d1a0ef0 to
6cf4a61
Compare
|
The Build runs multiple time on the CI |
|
yes, Build has run multiple times and final build was successful according to log files. But there is still one failing check. |
|
The Travis CI is only check first Build only, isn't it? First build test failure which is bind to CI and In next build It was fine. According to log second build (final build) says "BUILD SUCCESS" in the log. [INFO] Reactor Summary: |
6cf4a61 to
7c87b70
Compare
|
CI Build is test with PR[1], It contain data validations (fully) and leaflet support with map and tutorial with squashing commits [1] #238 |
|
Did you see my comment from 5 days ago? Now that I can run the code I found this behavior : Try the following code: The data output of this one have only one column - name but when I press
|
cee3c6b to
58a1de1
Compare
|
@bzz : ZeppelinIT which is failed in CI run fine in local environment. I have re-base (update) the PR. is there any more things to do for this PR? T E S T SRunning org.apache.zeppelin.ZeppelinIT Results : Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] |
|
Map Visualization for Zeppelin would be a great addition! I don't think it's good to select the lat and lon statically like so: The same goes for the key: There should be a settings drop down like for the other chart types where this can be configured. With the current version, that doesn't seem to work. (Only for me?) |
|
@datagiraffe : thanks for the interest
breaking happen in build due to CI binding test. you can find the points in this thread. |
|
@bzz : I have build PR for data validator. At the same time I will create new PR for leaflet mapping as lot of users are interested. |
|
@randerzander: Thanks for ping! |
|
@randerzander @Madhuka |
|
@corneadoug : Thanks, get #262, it contain data validation. |
|
@Madhuka Are you working on a new PR? |
|
any update on this? @Madhuka this would be very cool to have |
|
Hi @Madhuka any update on this? really appreciate your effort for this. |
|
After discussion with @Madhuka, this should be rebased and finished by 1st week of March. (since he is busy) There has been a new PR opened recently (#728), however I'd like Madhuka to finish his contribution for a few reasons:
However if it is not done by then, we should get things moving and go with #728, @eddies fine with that? |
|
@corneadoug absolutely. As I mentioned in #728, I only made my PR out of expediency because I didn't see any movement here. If @Madhuka will be revisiting this PR soon, that would be ideal--he definitely deserves the credit for all his work. |
|
@Madhuka Any update on this? |
|
When will this be in the main stream?It is a pity to see some great function missing while the solution is already available for more than half a year. Thanks. |
|
Based on the earlier comment, are we moving to #728 then? |
|
Referee #765 |
|
Great - will you have time to get that ready then? |
|
Nice work ! When we will be able to use these nice maps? |
|
@Madhuka Let's close this one since you opened another one |
|
@corneadoug As we have #765 We can close this, I am willing to finish that #765 as lot of people need this feature. Please let me know when I can continue to finish that from your end? |








