Skip to content

Conversation

@mayankkunwar
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tez-yetus

This comment was marked as outdated.

@tez-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 32m 20s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 15m 22s master passed
+1 💚 compile 2m 32s master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04
+1 💚 compile 2m 16s master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 45s master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 4s master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 1s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 2m 36s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04
+1 💚 javac 2m 36s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 2m 19s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 javac 2m 19s the patch passed
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 xml 0m 1s The patch has no ill-formed XML file.
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 22s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 4s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 73m 11s root in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 59s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
146m 10s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-253/2/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #253
JIRA Issue TEZ-4458
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit xml compile
uname Linux 133a5f87b5f8 4.15.0-191-generic #202-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 4 01:49:29 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality personality/tez.sh
git revision master / 25fc8c4
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-253/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 1843 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: . U: .
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-253/2/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@mayankkunwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is just a dependency upgrade, which should not require any additional tests. The changes are tested through existing unit tests.

@abstractdog abstractdog self-requested a review December 2, 2022 08:20
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.bouncycastle</groupId>
<artifactId>bcpkix-jdk15on</artifactId>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just wondering: what kind of test failure came when bcpkix wasn't included?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is the test failure report: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-253/1/testReport/
Tests were complaining that they were not able to find org/bouncycastle/asn1/bsi/BSIObjectIdentifiers

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay, thanks for clarifying!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And with this I also checked that hadoop and other dependencies under TEZ dependency tree and they were using older version of bcpkix. So I thought to upgrade that as well

@abstractdog abstractdog self-requested a review December 2, 2022 08:38
Copy link
Contributor

@abstractdog abstractdog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@abstractdog abstractdog merged commit 34d6810 into apache:master Dec 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants