-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-33160][SQL] Allow saving/loading INT96 in parquet w/o rebasing #30056
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b3699d1
Add the SQL config spark.sql.legacy.parquet.int96RebaseModeInWrite
MaxGekk 15dec11
Support rebasing INT96 in write
MaxGekk ada4448
Add parquet meta-key org.apache.spark.int96NoRebase
MaxGekk 01c46fc
Handle Parquet INT96 in newRebaseExceptionInWrite
MaxGekk 8a16ca1
Move rebasing out of toJulianDay()
MaxGekk 0bd60e4
Fix mode in int96RebaseFunc
MaxGekk 4f62e27
Check writing the metadata key 'org.apache.spark.int96NoRebase'
MaxGekk c91a6d5
Refactoring
MaxGekk fb67c68
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/origin/master' into parquet-reb…
MaxGekk 1c1a118
Add the SQL config spark.sql.legacy.parquet.int96RebaseModeInRead
MaxGekk 469d866
Support Parquet INT96 in newRebaseExceptionInRead()
MaxGekk 76330e2
Propagate the read SQL config to the readers
MaxGekk ab3fc54
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into parquet-rebase-int96
MaxGekk 1cc8c3e
Move rebasing out of fromJulianDay()
MaxGekk 5e37d8b
Impl rebaseInt96() in VectorizedColumnReader
MaxGekk ef298a0
Fix Vectorized Reader
MaxGekk 55fe5cc
Refactor tests
MaxGekk fab3a86
Fix ParquetIOSuite
MaxGekk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could the default be made
LegacyBehaviorPolicy.EXCEPTIONinstead? Could also do this in a follow-up PR if this is controversial.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure that we can do that in the minor release 3.1. This can break existing apps. @cloud-fan @HyukjinKwon WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a breaking change, but probably is acceptable as it doesn't lead to silent results changing. We need an item in the migration guide though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is the PR #30121 . Will see how many tests this will affect.