Skip to content

Conversation

@ueshin
Copy link
Member

@ueshin ueshin commented Aug 3, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up of #29294.
This PR changes the config name to switch allow/disallow SparkContext in executors as per the comment #29278 (review).

Why are the changes needed?

The config name spark.executor.allowSparkContext is more reasonable.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Yes, the config name is changed.

How was this patch tested?

Updated tests.

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @ueshin !

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 4, 2020

Test build #127004 has finished for PR 29341 at commit 133e7f1.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to branch-3.0.

HyukjinKwon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2020
… switch allow/disallow SparkContext in executors

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up of #29294.
This PR changes the config name to switch allow/disallow `SparkContext` in executors as per the comment #29278 (review).

### Why are the changes needed?

The config name `spark.executor.allowSparkContext` is more reasonable.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, the config name is changed.

### How was this patch tested?

Updated tests.

Closes #29341 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-32160/3.0/change_config_name.

Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon closed this Aug 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants