-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-31966][ML][TESTS][PYTHON] Increase the timeout for StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests.test_training_and_prediction #28798
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…_training_and_prediction
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2020
|
Test build #123820 has finished for PR 28798 at commit
|
Member
|
Merged to master/3.0. Thanks! |
dongjoon-hyun
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2020
…gisticRegressionWithSGDTests.test_training_and_prediction ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is similar with 64cb6f7 The test `StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests.test_training_and_prediction` seems also flaky. This PR just increases the timeout to 3 mins too. The cause is very likely the time elapsed. See https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123787/testReport/pyspark.mllib.tests.test_streaming_algorithms/StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests/test_training_and_prediction/ ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 330, in test_training_and_prediction eventually(condition, timeout=60.0) File "/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 90, in eventually % (timeout, lastValue)) AssertionError: Test failed due to timeout after 60 sec, with last condition returning: Latest errors: 0.67, 0.71, 0.78, 0.7, 0.75, 0.74, 0.73, 0.69, 0.62, 0.71, 0.69, 0.75, 0.72, 0.77, 0.71, 0.74, 0.76, 0.78, 0.7, 0.78, 0.8, 0.74, 0.77, 0.75, 0.76, 0.76, 0.75 ``` ### Why are the changes needed? To make PR builds more stable. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Jenkins will test them out. Closes #28798 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31966. Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 56d4f27) Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Member
Author
|
Thank you @dongjoon-hyun! |
holdenk
pushed a commit
to holdenk/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2020
…gisticRegressionWithSGDTests.test_training_and_prediction ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is similar with apache@64cb6f7 The test `StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests.test_training_and_prediction` seems also flaky. This PR just increases the timeout to 3 mins too. The cause is very likely the time elapsed. See https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123787/testReport/pyspark.mllib.tests.test_streaming_algorithms/StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests/test_training_and_prediction/ ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 330, in test_training_and_prediction eventually(condition, timeout=60.0) File "/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 90, in eventually % (timeout, lastValue)) AssertionError: Test failed due to timeout after 60 sec, with last condition returning: Latest errors: 0.67, 0.71, 0.78, 0.7, 0.75, 0.74, 0.73, 0.69, 0.62, 0.71, 0.69, 0.75, 0.72, 0.77, 0.71, 0.74, 0.76, 0.78, 0.7, 0.78, 0.8, 0.74, 0.77, 0.75, 0.76, 0.76, 0.75 ``` ### Why are the changes needed? To make PR builds more stable. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Jenkins will test them out. Closes apache#28798 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31966. Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 56d4f27) Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
HyukjinKwon
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2020
…ingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests.test_training_and_prediction ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR backports #28798 to branch-2.4 to reduce the flakiness in the tests. This is similar with 64cb6f7 The test `StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests.test_training_and_prediction` seems also flaky. This PR just increases the timeout to 3 mins too. The cause is very likely the time elapsed. See https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123787/testReport/pyspark.mllib.tests.test_streaming_algorithms/StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests/test_training_and_prediction/ ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/python/pyspark/mllib/tests/test_streaming_algorithms.py", line 330, in test_training_and_prediction eventually(condition, timeout=60.0) File "/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/python/pyspark/testing/utils.py", line 90, in eventually % (timeout, lastValue)) AssertionError: Test failed due to timeout after 60 sec, with last condition returning: Latest errors: 0.67, 0.71, 0.78, 0.7, 0.75, 0.74, 0.73, 0.69, 0.62, 0.71, 0.69, 0.75, 0.72, 0.77, 0.71, 0.74, 0.76, 0.78, 0.7, 0.78, 0.8, 0.74, 0.77, 0.75, 0.76, 0.76, 0.75 ``` ### Why are the changes needed? To make PR builds more stable. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Jenkins will test them out. Closes #29481 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31966-2.4. Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is similar with 64cb6f7
The test
StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests.test_training_and_predictionseems also flaky. This PR just increases the timeout to 3 mins too. The cause is very likely the time elapsed.See https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123787/testReport/pyspark.mllib.tests.test_streaming_algorithms/StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGDTests/test_training_and_prediction/
Why are the changes needed?
To make PR builds more stable.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Jenkins will test them out.