Skip to content

Conversation

@HeartSaVioR
Copy link
Contributor

Please ignore the content; will raise another PR once the patch fixes the test.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 10, 2020

Test build #116441 has finished for PR 27159 at commit b77f9d8.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HeartSaVioR
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest this, please

@HeartSaVioR
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest this, please

HyukjinKwon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch increases the memory limit in the test 'test_memory_limit' from 1m to 8m.
Credit to srowen and HyukjinKwon to provide the idea of suspicion and guide how to fix.

### Why are the changes needed?

We observed consistent Pyspark test failures on multiple PRs (#26955, #26201, #27064) which block the PR builds whenever the test is included.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Jenkins builds passed in WIP PR (#27159)

Closes #27162 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-30480.

Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 10, 2020

Test build #116451 has finished for PR 27159 at commit b77f9d8.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 10, 2020

Test build #116450 has finished for PR 27159 at commit b77f9d8.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HeartSaVioR
Copy link
Contributor Author

3 tests ran so far, 1 failed from other flaky test, 2 passed. Looks like working so far. Closing.

@HeartSaVioR HeartSaVioR deleted the WIP-PR-26955-testing-pyspark-test-test_memory_limit branch January 10, 2020 07:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants