Skip to content

Conversation

@gszadovszky
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gszadovszky
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zivanfi, could you please check this out?

*
* (*) Because of the sorting order is not specified properly for floating
* point values (relations vs. total ordering) the following
* compatibility rules should be applied:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add: "when reading statistics".

* (*) Because of the sorting order is not specified properly for floating
* point values (relations vs. total ordering) the following
* compatibility rules should be applied:
* - When looking for NaN values, min and max should be ignored.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please move this to the end of the list as this is the least important item.

Copy link
Contributor

@zivanfi zivanfi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks.

@zivanfi zivanfi merged commit 952c263 into apache:master Mar 26, 2018
@rdblue
Copy link
Contributor

rdblue commented Mar 30, 2018

+1

Thanks for working on this @gszadovszky and @zivanfi!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants