HDDS-4095. Byteman script to debug HCFS performance #1311
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request
Teragen with Ozone is reported to be slower with Ozone than Hdfs with some specific configuration.
To make it easier to compare different file system, we need an easy measurement on the same point (
FSDataOutputStream.write) to compare the time spent in that method with Hdfs/Ozone/other file systems.It can be done with a byteman instrumentation rule
What is the link to the Apache JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4095
How was this patch tested?
https://elek.github.io/ozone-notes/performance/20_teragen/
https://elek.github.io/ozone-notes/performance/19_hcfs/
Both tests used this btm file. FS usage was reported on the stdout:
For example: