This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
[v1.x] Refactor onnx tests for object classification, add object detection tests #19802
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
35f129f
Fix onnx export of arange when stop is none. Refactor unit test to co…
9a95b57
Use correct outname names for SliceChannel.
c6db38b
Cast output of broadcast_equal to input type, like MXNet does.
c3d7584
Add unit test for broadcast_equal onnx export.
b613890
Require onnx opset >= 11 for SliceChannel which doesn't require the s…
499fe2c
Support passing dtype to zeros_like and ones_like.
b2a476e
Refactor object classification tests to make more extendable and add …
86b039f
Fix lint
808819c
Update onnxruntime in CI to 1.6.0.
ebc8e6d
Install gluoncv in CI environment for onnxruntime tests.
fcfe006
Add test case for negative axis in SliceChannel.
22c9826
Add export functions and unit tests for broadcast_minimum and lesser_…
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shall we consider adding more test images?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, we will soon in upcoming PRs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also we should have tests which avoid depending on extrenal sources
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In upcoming PRs for these onnxruntime tests, let's migrate to use either an s3 bucket for test data or check them into the repo. the first is ideal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can also create a second repo just for resources. I would actually prefer that because this would allow everyone to fully replicate the setup even it the s3 bucket goes away