Skip to content

Conversation

@steveloughran
Copy link
Contributor

Followup to HADOOP-19696: the license URL in asf license headers MUST be http and not https

This is #8112 backported to branch-3.4

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

apache#8112)

Followup to  HADOOP-19696: the license URL in asf license headers MUST be http and not https
@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 18m 54s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗 xmllint 0m 0s xmllint was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ branch-3.4 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 40m 54s branch-3.4 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 23s branch-3.4 passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 0m 22s branch-3.4 passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 26s branch-3.4 passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 26s branch-3.4 passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 22s branch-3.4 passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 shadedclient 79m 15s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 15s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 14s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 0m 14s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 13s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 javac 0m 13s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 16s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 14s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 15s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 shadedclient 38m 21s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 0m 18s hadoop-assemblies in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 37s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
140m 41s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.52 ServerAPI=1.52 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-8115/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #8115
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell detsecrets xmllint
uname Linux 0c68995cf3f0 5.15.0-156-generic #166-Ubuntu SMP Sat Aug 9 00:02:46 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision branch-3.4 / 758c4c1
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-8115/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 528 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-assemblies U: hadoop-assemblies
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-8115/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@steveloughran steveloughran merged commit 224a102 into apache:branch-3.4 Dec 2, 2025
0 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants