Skip to content

Conversation

@dgzdot
Copy link
Contributor

@dgzdot dgzdot commented Jul 17, 2025

YARN-11835 DockerContainerDeletionTask did not clear tasks in leveldb

Description of PR

DockerContainerDeletionTask did not clear tasks in leveldb, which can result in tasks that were expected to be cleared remaining in leveldb. Each time the nodemanager is restarted, the corresponding deletion task is triggered

How was this patch tested?

Tested in our own production environment and passed

YARN-11835 DockerContainerDeletionTask did not clear tasks in leveldb
@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 24m 35s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 1s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 1s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 44m 5s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 31s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 1m 27s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 39s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 48s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 49s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 41s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 30s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 37m 32s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 21s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 1m 21s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 17s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 javac 1m 17s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 27s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 35s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 33s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 27s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 37m 6s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 28m 21s hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 38s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
187m 38s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.51 ServerAPI=1.51 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7811/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7811
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 10bfbb6db8e6 5.15.0-142-generic #152-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 19 10:54:31 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 278a430
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7811/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 556 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7811/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

LinuxContainerExecutor exec = ((LinuxContainerExecutor)
getDeletionService().getContainerExecutor());
exec.removeDockerContainer(containerId);
deletionTaskFinished();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is make sense for deletion,I'm wondering if I need to set the status of the deletionTask after removeDockerContainer fails

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You have considered it more thoroughly, so that there is still a chance to clean it up again after the deletion fails.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Nov 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants