YARN-10829. Support getApplications API in FederationClientInterceptor#3135
Merged
bibinchundatt merged 11 commits intoapache:trunkfrom Jul 23, 2021
akshatb1:trunk
Merged
YARN-10829. Support getApplications API in FederationClientInterceptor#3135bibinchundatt merged 11 commits intoapache:trunkfrom akshatb1:trunk
bibinchundatt merged 11 commits intoapache:trunkfrom
akshatb1:trunk
Conversation
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Contributor
Author
|
@goiri @bibinchundatt Could you kindly help in reviewing this PR? Thanks. |
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
goiri
reviewed
Jun 24, 2021
| new ConcurrentHashMap<SubClusterId, ApplicationClientProtocol>(); | ||
| routerMetrics = RouterMetrics.getMetrics(); | ||
|
|
||
| returnPartialReport = |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The lines could be split in a more friendly way:
Suggested change
| returnPartialReport = | |
| returnPartialReport = conf.getBoolean( | |
| YarnConfiguration.ROUTER_CLIENTRM_PARTIAL_RESULTS_ENABLED, | |
| YarnConfiguration.DEFAULT_ROUTER_CLIENTRM_PARTIAL_RESULTS_ENABLED); |
| throw new NotImplementedException("Code is not implemented"); | ||
| if (request == null) { | ||
| RouterServerUtil.logAndThrowException( | ||
| "Missing getApplications request.", |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think the spacing follows the right convention.
The checkstyle should flag all this.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There were no flags in checkstyle. I have applied Hadoop formatter and ensure that checkstyle plugin is not giving any errors.
| invokeConcurrent(clusterIds, remoteMethod, | ||
| GetApplicationsResponse.class); | ||
|
|
||
| //Merge the Application Reports |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| //Merge the Application Reports | |
| // Merge the Application Reports |
| Map<ApplicationId, ApplicationReport> federationAM = new HashMap<>(); | ||
| Map<ApplicationId, ApplicationReport> federationUAMSum = new HashMap<>(); | ||
|
|
||
| for(GetApplicationsResponse appResponse : responses){ |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| for(GetApplicationsResponse appResponse : responses){ | |
| for (GetApplicationsResponse appResponse : responses){ |
| } | ||
| // This ApplicationReport is an UAM | ||
| } else { | ||
| if (federationAM.containsKey(appId)) { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| if (federationAM.containsKey(appId)) { | |
| } else if (federationAM.containsKey(appId)) { |
And then the rest of the elses would go with this.
...test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/router/clientrm/TestFederationClientInterceptor.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| newInstance(appTypes)); | ||
|
|
||
| Assert.assertNotNull(responseGet); | ||
| Assert.assertEquals(0, responseGet.getApplicationList().size()); |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| Assert.assertEquals(0, responseGet.getApplicationList().size()); | |
| Assert.assertTrue(responseGet.getApplicationList().isEmpty()); |
|
|
||
| GetApplicationsResponse responseGet = | ||
| interceptor.getApplications( | ||
| GetApplicationsRequest. |
...r/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/router/clientrm/TestRouterYarnClientUtils.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| null); | ||
|
|
||
| //Add unmanaged application to list | ||
| ApplicationId applicationId2 = ApplicationId.newInstance(1234, |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You could use shorter names like appId2
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Contributor
Author
|
@goiri Thanks for providing your comments. I have addressed the comments. Could you kindly help in re-reviewing? |
goiri
reviewed
Jun 25, 2021
| configurationPrefixToSkipCompare | ||
| .add(YarnConfiguration.ROUTER_CLIENTRM_SUBMIT_RETRY); | ||
| configurationPrefixToSkipCompare | ||
| .add(YarnConfiguration.ROUTER_CLIENTRM_PARTIAL_RESULTS_ENABLED); |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Match the indentation with the previous one.
| new Class[] {GetApplicationsRequest.class}, new Object[] {request}); | ||
| ArrayList<SubClusterId> clusterIds = new ArrayList<>(subclusters.keySet()); | ||
| Map<SubClusterId, GetApplicationsResponse> applications = | ||
| invokeConcurrent(clusterIds, remoteMethod, |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This probably fits in a single line
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
After using Collection directly, it does not fit in a single line.
| } else if (federationUAMSum.containsKey(appId)) { | ||
| // Merge the current UAM with its own UAM and update the list of UAM | ||
| federationUAMSum.put(appId, | ||
| mergeUAMWithUAM(federationUAMSum.get(appId), appReport)); |
| private static boolean mergeUamToReport(String appName, | ||
| boolean returnPartialResult){ | ||
|
|
||
| return returnPartialResult || (appName != null && |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To make it more readable you could do somethin like:
if (returnPartialResult) {
return true;
}
if (appName == null) {
return false;
}
...
| @Test | ||
| public void testGetApplicationsResponse() | ||
| throws YarnException, IOException, InterruptedException { | ||
| LOG.info("Test FederationClientInterceptor: " + |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I mean that putting the whole thing would fit in 80:
LOG.info("Test FederationClientInterceptor: Get Applications Response");
| federationFacade.getSubClusters(true); | ||
| ClientMethod remoteMethod = new ClientMethod("getApplications", | ||
| new Class[] {GetApplicationsRequest.class}, new Object[] {request}); | ||
| ArrayList<SubClusterId> clusterIds = new ArrayList<>(subclusters.keySet()); |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm pretty sure we are doing this conversion to list a bunch of times, having one that takes Collection would remove some noise.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overloaded the invokeConcurrent method to take Collection. Will update the other usage in a follow up PR once this is merged.
| ApplicationId appId2 = ApplicationId.newInstance(1234, | ||
| value); | ||
| ApplicationReport appReport2 = ApplicationReport.newInstance( | ||
| appId2, ApplicationAttemptId.newInstance(appId2, |
|
|
||
| ApplicationReport appReport = ApplicationReport.newInstance( | ||
| appId, ApplicationAttemptId.newInstance(appId, | ||
| 1), |
| List<ApplicationReport> applications = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
|
|
||
| //Add managed application to list | ||
| ApplicationId appId = ApplicationId.newInstance(1234, |
| null); | ||
|
|
||
| //Add unmanaged application to list | ||
| ApplicationId appId2 = ApplicationId.newInstance(1234, |
Contributor
Author
|
@goiri I have addressed the further comments. Please take a look whenever you get a chance. Thanks. |
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
goiri
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2021
| new ConcurrentHashMap<SubClusterId, ApplicationClientProtocol>(); | ||
| routerMetrics = RouterMetrics.getMetrics(); | ||
|
|
||
| returnPartialReport = conf.getBoolean( |
| } | ||
| return results; | ||
| } | ||
| <R> Map<SubClusterId, R> invokeConcurrent(Collection<SubClusterId> clusterIds, |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add break line right before the method definition.
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
bibinchundatt
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2021
...outer/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/router/clientrm/RouterYarnClientUtils.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...outer/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/router/clientrm/RouterYarnClientUtils.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...outer/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/router/clientrm/RouterYarnClientUtils.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bibinchundatt
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2021
kiran-maturi
pushed a commit
to kiran-maturi/hadoop
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2021
apache#3135) YARN-10829. Support getApplications API in FederationClientInterceptor (apache#3135)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implementing getApplications API in FederationClientInterceptors.
Unit tests are running successfully on dev machine.