-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add sdf kafka poll latencies #34275
Add sdf kafka poll latencies #34275
Conversation
R: @scwhittle |
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
runners/core-java/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/core/metrics/MetricsContainerImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
runners/core-java/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/core/metrics/MetricsContainerImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
runners/core-java/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/core/metrics/MetricsContainerImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sdks/java/io/kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kafka/ReadFromKafkaDoFn.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
6f9eb14
to
31585e7
Compare
Run Java PreCommit |
rawRecords = poll(consumer, kafkaSourceDescriptor.getTopicPartition()); | ||
KafkaMetrics kafkaMetrics = KafkaSinkMetrics.kafkaMetrics(); | ||
rawRecords = poll(consumer, kafkaSourceDescriptor.getTopicPartition(), kafkaMetrics); | ||
kafkaMetrics.flushBufferedMetrics(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about not flushing here and just falling through?
would it be ok to just flush once outside the while loop with a try { } finally { kafkaMetrics.flushBufferedMetrics(); } block?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't do it because of the returns, but apparently the finally block will run and then return, so that will work. I have modified the code.
sdks/java/io/kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kafka/ReadFromKafkaDoFn.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sdks/java/io/kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kafka/ReadFromKafkaDoFn.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Run Java PreCommit |
Run Java PreCommit |
} else { | ||
Preconditions.checkStateNotNull(this.extractOutputTimestampFn); | ||
outputTimestamp = extractOutputTimestampFn.apply(kafkaRecord); | ||
KafkaMetrics kafkaMetrics = KafkaSinkMetrics.kafkaMetrics(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we instead have the metrics lifetime longer? Seems like avoiding allocation/flush per pull will be better for performance.
KafkaMetrics kafkaMetrics = KafkaSinkMetrics.kafkaMetrics();
try {
while (true) {
}
} finally {
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the way the container is implemented is that once its flushed, we dont reuse it. I'm less usre of the context behind this decision, I dont see why we cant change it, as I agree it would make it more efficient, I'll leave that for a subsequent PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still think it would only be flushed once. it would just live the whole time and be flushed at the end once.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
sdks/java/io/kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kafka/ReadFromKafkaDoFn.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
5ad81c7
to
4ac4b06
Compare
4ac4b06
to
a900a43
Compare
a900a43
to
ad9471a
Compare
} else { | ||
Preconditions.checkStateNotNull(this.extractOutputTimestampFn); | ||
outputTimestamp = extractOutputTimestampFn.apply(kafkaRecord); | ||
KafkaMetrics kafkaMetrics = KafkaSinkMetrics.kafkaMetrics(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still think it would only be flushed once. it would just live the whole time and be flushed at the end once.
ad9471a
to
e72dc1e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Run Java PreCommit) |
Run Java PreCommit |
https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/runs/13978267141/job/39140793274?pr=34275 is not related to this PR. |
|
|
* add kafka sdf metrics * address comments * address more comments * address comments --------- Co-authored-by: Naireen <[email protected]>
Adds sdf poll metrics to kafka for runner v2
Should be merged after #34244
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123
), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>
instead.CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.