Skip to content

Conversation

@amoeba
Copy link
Member

@amoeba amoeba commented Mar 21, 2025

Rationale for this change

Closes #45883.

What changes are included in this PR?

  • Updated template for new issues

Are these changes tested?

  • Proofread

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting review Awaiting review label Mar 21, 2025
@amoeba
Copy link
Member Author

amoeba commented Mar 21, 2025

Note, don't merge until #45811.

Copy link
Member

@raulcd raulcd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @amoeba

@raulcd raulcd merged commit 21c9628 into apache:main Mar 24, 2025
6 checks passed
@raulcd raulcd removed the awaiting review Awaiting review label Mar 24, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Mar 24, 2025
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 21c9628.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

zanmato1984 pushed a commit to zanmato1984/arrow that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
…sions (apache#45884)

### Rationale for this change

Closes apache#45883.

### What changes are included in this PR?

- Updated template for new issues

### Are these changes tested?

- Proofread

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* GitHub Issue: apache#45883

Authored-by: Bryce Mecum <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting merge Awaiting merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Docs] Update GitHub Issue Template for GitHub Discussions

2 participants