-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
ARROW-14840: [R][CI] test-ubuntu-20.10-docs nightly build failing due to R install issue #11815
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 3 commits
8804c56
518cb8a
9ab33be
1cfdfcf
e734997
53e687c
4092a64
69c79df
a2134ee
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1256,12 +1256,12 @@ tasks: | |
| GO: 1.15 | ||
| run: debian-go | ||
|
|
||
| test-ubuntu-20.10-docs: | ||
| test-ubuntu-20.04-docs: | ||
| ci: azure | ||
| template: docker-tests/azure.linux.yml | ||
| params: | ||
| env: | ||
| UBUNTU: "20.10" | ||
| UBUNTU: "20.04" | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good point! Given that this additional job was introduced in #10430 and things have moved on since then, I've removed the extra job. Or should I add it back in and pin it to a different version? It'd be good to know your thoughts too @jonkeane as you were the author of the PR I mentioned above and I don't fully understand everything that's going on there.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. IIRC, I introduced It looks like the 20.10 build was changed from a much older one in #9933. I'm not sure what the purpose of having a default build and then a separate build on a non-default version is. The one reason I can think of is that we want the non-default version to be a test of a new(ish) ubuntu version, to check for issues there. If that is the case (and we want to maintain that), we probably should build on 21.04 or 21.10. But I'm also totally fine removing the non-default docs build if it's more hassle than is helpful to maintain it.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. OK, sounds like it made sense at the time but no longer serves a specific purpose, so unless there's any other reason to keep it in, let's leave it out for now (and add it back in if necessary later).
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We chose Ubuntu 20.10 to reduce build time by using system gRPC: #9933 (review) I'm OK with removing the docs job with non default Could you also remove
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Aha, thanks for clarifying that @kou! Just to check my understanding, did you mean remove the reference to 20.10 in
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes. |
||
| run: ubuntu-docs | ||
|
|
||
| test-ubuntu-default-docs: | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.