Skip to content

tpu-client-next: rm QUIC_PORT_OFFSET #9757

Merged
alexpyattaev merged 1 commit intoanza-xyz:masterfrom
alexpyattaev:rm_quic_offset
Dec 30, 2025
Merged

tpu-client-next: rm QUIC_PORT_OFFSET #9757
alexpyattaev merged 1 commit intoanza-xyz:masterfrom
alexpyattaev:rm_quic_offset

Conversation

@alexpyattaev
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

  • QUIC_PORT_OFFSET is no longer needed as all ContactInfo packets include tpu-quic record

Summary of Changes

  • rm the useless code

@alexpyattaev alexpyattaev changed the title rm QUIC_PORT_OFFSET from tpu-client-next tpu-client-next: rm QUIC_PORT_OFFSET Dec 28, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.7%. Comparing base (346847e) to head (26f5a57).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9757   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage    82.6%    82.7%           
=======================================
  Files         902      902           
  Lines      324403   324396    -7     
=======================================
+ Hits       268270   268281   +11     
+ Misses      56133    56115   -18     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@alexpyattaev alexpyattaev marked this pull request as ready for review December 29, 2025 19:54
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@KirillLykov KirillLykov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'm glad that we finally got rid of it

@alexpyattaev alexpyattaev added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 30, 2025
Merged via the queue into anza-xyz:master with commit 378205e Dec 30, 2025
47 checks passed
@alexpyattaev alexpyattaev deleted the rm_quic_offset branch December 30, 2025 11:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants