Port dotnet cataloger to new generic cataloger pattern#1286
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <alex.goodman@anchore.com>
a21e5ba to
ca54e1b
Compare
kzantow
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2022
Benchmark Test ResultsBenchmark results from the latest changes vs base branch |
GijsCalis
pushed a commit
to GijsCalis/syft
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <alex.goodman@anchore.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <alex.goodman@anchore.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up to #1281 , porting the APK cataloger to the new
generic.CatalogerThis additionally brings in a new
internal/pkgtesthelper functions to aid in making tests easier to make (if you're using the generic cataloger). I was finding I was making the exact same changes to tests everywhere, and the code was very boilerplate... thus a helper test function makes sense here. I also found that the comparison function I was using wasn't considering all fields of the elements under test, which means there may be issues that are not raised during testing.If accepted, I'll head back to the catalogers I just updated and move the pattern forward there as well.