Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Auth] #377 Auth respond service #401

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 5, 2022
Merged

Conversation

llbartekll
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@arein arein added the accepted label Aug 3, 2022
@llbartekll llbartekll self-assigned this Aug 3, 2022
Comment on lines +46 to +48
public init<C>(id: RPCID, result: C) where C: Codable {
self.init(id: id, outcome: .success(AnyCodable(result)))
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that you needed an init that receives a RPCID. In your opinion, do you think it's better to add these specific inits or should we change the default init from internal to public?

…V2 into auth-respond-service-#377-

# Conflicts:
#	Sources/Auth/Services/Wallet/AuthRequestSubscriber.swift
#	Tests/AuthTests/Stubs/RequestSubscriptionPayload.swift
@llbartekll llbartekll merged commit b1fd808 into develop Aug 5, 2022
@llbartekll llbartekll deleted the auth-respond-service-#377- branch August 5, 2022 06:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants