Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve stability of crypto_memcmp test. #757

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2018
Merged

Conversation

iphydf
Copy link
Member

@iphydf iphydf commented Feb 3, 2018

This change is Reviewable

Also reduce number of people in conference to 5, because on Circle CI the
test times out trying to connect more than 6 or 7 people. The persistent
conferences PR will improve this so we can set it much higher then.
@sudden6
Copy link

sudden6 commented Feb 7, 2018

:lgtm_strong:


Reviewed 9 of 9 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

@robinlinden
Copy link
Member

Reviewed 9 of 9 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, all commit checks successful.


CMakeLists.txt, line 436 at r1 (raw file):

################################################################################

# Compile the GTest library.

Why do we compile this ourselves?


Comments from Reviewable

@iphydf
Copy link
Member Author

iphydf commented Feb 8, 2018

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, all commit checks successful.


CMakeLists.txt, line 436 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, robinlinden (Robin Lindén) wrote…

Why do we compile this ourselves?

GTest doesn't come with a precompiled library. This means it's so easy to compile we can even do it on appveyor :).


Comments from Reviewable

@iphydf iphydf merged commit 835b9fb into TokTok:master Feb 8, 2018
@iphydf iphydf deleted the memcmp-test branch February 8, 2018 11:50
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants