ci(github-action): update action misospace/pr-reviewer-action (v2.1.10 ➔ v2.2.0) - abandoned - #4329
ci(github-action): update action misospace/pr-reviewer-action (v2.1.10 ➔ v2.2.0) - abandoned#4329renovate[bot] wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
|
|
Overall Grade |
Security Reliability Complexity Hygiene |
Code Review Summary
| Analyzer | Status | Updated (UTC) | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| JavaScript | Aug 6, 2026 7:45p.m. | Review ↗ | |
| Shell | Aug 6, 2026 7:45p.m. | Review ↗ |
Important
AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR review workflow now pins ChangesWorkflow action update
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
220313a to
573ba38
Compare
AI Automated ReviewAnalysis engine: omniroute@http://litellm.ai.svc.cluster.local/v1 (openai) Recommendation: Approve — clean minor bump of the PR-reviewer action with a consistent prompt refactor. Release notes (v2.1.10 → v2.1.11 → v2.2.0):
Change-by-change:
Tool Harness Findings: Unknowns: The workflow file read was truncated mid-comment and the harness stopped at tool-call budget, but the diff fully covers the changed lines, so no behavior affecting this review is unverified. |
573ba38 to
15c4479
Compare
v2.2.0 adds review_verbosity, which patches the bundled prompt with a ~300-word target and moves minor/info out of prose into the findings array. The hand-written "keep review length proportional" rule in the system_prompt addendum now duplicates it, so drop it.
Upstream #426 landed in v2.1.11: system_prompt_file and system_prompt are concatenated (file first, inline second) instead of the file being silently dropped. The standing rules move to .github/pr-review-prompt.md, leaving the scalar to hold only the per-PR release-notes branch.
tool_evidence_memory is on by default and seeds a corpus section telling the model to reuse prior evidence instead of re-gathering. The addendum is appended after the bundled default, so "cite only sources fetched this run" overrode it and forced a re-fetch every incremental review. Narrow the rule to the failure it was written for: claiming "confirmed" for a source that was never read.
Edited/Blocked NotificationRenovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR. You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above. |
Autoclosing SkippedThis PR has been flagged for autoclosing. However, it is being skipped due to the branch being already modified. Please close/delete it manually or report a bug if you think this is in error. |
This PR contains the following updates:
v2.1.10→v2.2.0Release Notes
misospace/pr-reviewer-action (misospace/pr-reviewer-action)
v2.2.0Compare Source
What's Changed
Full Changelog: misospace/pr-reviewer-action@v2.1.11...v2.2.0
v2.1.11Compare Source
What's Changed
Full Changelog: misospace/pr-reviewer-action@v2.1.10...v2.1.11
Configuration
📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Brussels)
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.