There is no reference from asset to asset-type.

[edwinvandenbelt]

Whenever you have an asset, you'll never know the asset-type....
This is used in
/operator/available-assets
/legs/{id}/available-assets
and in
/planning-options/

All should contain (in 1.3) a type-of-asset, not asset. In the type-of-asset there is already a field amount-available. We should add an array with 'instances' or 'assets', containing the physical assets.

[
{
"type-id": "VALUE",
"name": "string",
"asset-class": "BIKE",
"asset-sub-class": "string", .... ,
"amount-available: 1,
"assets": [{
"asset-id": "string", ....
"place": { ... },
}]
}
]

to remove 'asset' from simple-leg and of the result of /operator/available-assets and replace the result of /legs/{id}/available-assets from asset to asset-type, we should wait until 2.0.

A less elegant solution is to add the asset-type object to the asset. This will increase the amount of transported data.