New LBFC-CF mappings #4859
Merged
New LBFC-CF mappings #4859
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
|
Contributor
Author
|
I expect these mappings are all fine. To avoid staleness I propose reviewing and merging at the end of September. |
Contributor
Author
|
Julian has approved this as working for their tests 👍 |
bjlittle
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2022
Member
bjlittle
left a comment
bjlittle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@trexfeathers Awesome, thanks 👍
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚀 Pull Request
Linked: SciTools/iris-grib#297 - Julian Heming is aiming for some additional GRIB-to-PP mappings.
I was able to confirm Julian's suggested STASH-LBFC mappings via the Met Office Codes Registry. We had all the referenced STASH codes in Iris, but were missing some of the LBFC codes.
This is fresh territory for me so I'm not 100% confident. Please can the reviewer be vigilant!
I also need Julian's eyes on this before merging. I don't think he's on GitHub but I will be contacting personally.
Julian: I have not included the following from your suggestion, since they were not in the Met Office Codes Registry:
m01s20i101, LBFC1112m01s20i102, LBFC1113Consult Iris pull request check list