Skip to content

feat: restrict @all and @here autocomplete by user permissions - #40262

Open
ishanmitra wants to merge 3 commits into
RocketChat:developfrom
ishanmitra:feat/show-all-here-user-permission
Open

feat: restrict @all and @here autocomplete by user permissions#40262
ishanmitra wants to merge 3 commits into
RocketChat:developfrom
ishanmitra:feat/show-all-here-user-permission

Conversation

@ishanmitra

@ishanmitra ishanmitra commented Apr 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Proposed changes

The Compose mentions list currently shows @all and @here regardless of the user's permissions, whether they are allowed to or not. This change introduces only showing the allowed tags.

Issue(s)

This feature request has been implemented in React Native based on this feature request:
RocketChat/feature-requests#871

Reference to the merged PR in the React Native Rocket Chat repository:
RocketChat/Rocket.Chat.ReactNative#6821

Screenshots

  • User with no mention permissions
image
  • User with only mention-all permission
image
  • User with only mention-here permission
image
  • User with both permissions
image

Further comments

Unit tests have been added for the above feature.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Mention autocomplete now respects room-specific permissions for @ALL and @here, showing those options only when allowed.
  • Tests

    • Added automated tests confirming permission-gated visibility of @ mention suggestions across permission combinations to prevent regressions.

Review Change Stack

@ishanmitra
ishanmitra requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2026 19:20
@dionisio-bot

dionisio-bot Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

  • This PR is missing the 'stat: QA assured' label
  • This PR is missing the required milestone or project

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 49adc47

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 64464cd7-1c9e-4c28-bb92-26f219fdae95

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa42a41 and 49adc47.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
📜 Recent review details
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{ts,tsx,js}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/playwright.mdc)

**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Write concise, technical TypeScript/JavaScript with accurate typing in Playwright tests
Avoid code comments in the implementation

Files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2026-03-06T18:10:15.268Z
Learnt from: tassoevan
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39397
File: packages/gazzodown/src/code/CodeBlock.spec.tsx:47-68
Timestamp: 2026-03-06T18:10:15.268Z
Learning: In tests (especially those using testing-library/dom/jsdom) for Rocket.Chat components, the HTML <code> element has an implicit ARIA role of 'code'. Therefore, screen.getByRole('code') or screen.findByRole('code') will locate <code> elements even without a role attribute. Do not flag findByRole('code') as invalid in reviews; prefer using the implicit role instead of adding role="code" unless necessary for accessibility.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-03-27T14:52:56.865Z
Learnt from: dougfabris
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39892
File: apps/meteor/client/views/room/contextualBar/Threads/Thread.tsx:150-155
Timestamp: 2026-03-27T14:52:56.865Z
Learning: In Rocket.Chat, there are two different `ModalBackdrop` components with different prop APIs. During review, confirm the import source: (1) `rocket.chat/fuselage` `ModalBackdrop` uses `ModalBackdropProps` based on `BoxProps` (so it supports `onClick` and other Box/DOM props) and does not have an `onDismiss` prop; (2) `rocket.chat/ui-client` `ModalBackdrop` uses a narrower props interface like `{ children?: ReactNode; onDismiss?: () => void }` and handles Escape keypress and outside mouse-up, and it does not forward arbitrary DOM props such as `onClick`. Flag mismatched props (e.g., `onDismiss` passed to the fuselage component or `onClick` passed to the ui-client component) and ensure the usage matches the correct component being imported.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-05-06T12:21:44.083Z
Learnt from: juliajforesti
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 40256
File: apps/meteor/client/components/CreateDiscussion/CreateDiscussion.tsx:121-149
Timestamp: 2026-05-06T12:21:44.083Z
Learning: Field wrappers in rocket.chat/fuselage-forms (Field, FieldLabel, FieldRow, FieldError, FieldHint) auto-create htmlFor/id associations, aria-describedby, and role="alert" for errors. Do not manually set htmlFor, id, aria-describedby, or role attributes when using these wrappers. This automatic wiring does not apply to plain rocket.chat/fuselage components, which require explicit ID wiring per the accessibility docs. In code reviews, prefer using fuselage-forms wrappers for form fields and verify there is no unnecessary manual ID/aria wiring in files that use these wrappers. If a component uses plain fuselage components, ensure proper id wiring as per docs.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx (4)

1-13: LGTM!


15-27: LGTM!


29-55: LGTM!


57-85: LGTM!


Walkthrough

Adds room-scoped permission checks so the composer @ mention autocomplete only offers _id: 'all' and _id: 'here' when the user has mention-all or mention-here in the current room; includes a Jest test covering permission permutations.

Changes

ComposerPopupProvider

Layer / File(s) Summary
ComposerPopupProvider Tests
apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
New Jest/React Testing Library test that mounts ComposerPopupProvider under an app-root wrapper with varied room permissions, captures useComposerPopupOptions(), locates the '@' popup, calls getItemsFromLocal(''), and asserts _id: 'all' and _id: 'here' appear only when mention-all / mention-here are granted respectively.
ComposerPopupProvider Implementation
apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
Provider now imports useAtLeastOnePermission, computes canMentionAll/canMentionHere scoped to rid, requires those flags when inserting _id: 'all' / _id: 'here' system suggestions, and adds them to the useMemo dependency array.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • tassoevan
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: restricting @all and @here autocomplete suggestions based on user permissions, which aligns with the primary objective of the PR.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

Tip

💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.

Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.

  • Generate code and open pull requests
  • Plan features and break down work
  • Investigate incidents and troubleshoot customer tickets together
  • Automate recurring tasks and respond to alerts with triggers
  • Summarize progress and report instantly

Built for teams:

  • Shared memory across your entire org—no repeating context
  • Per-thread sandboxes to safely plan and execute work
  • Governance built-in—scoped access, auditability, and budget controls

One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack.

👉 Get started


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot added the type: feature Pull requests that introduces new feature label Apr 22, 2026

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx`:
- Around line 12-17: The permission mock for hasAtLeastOnePermission ignores the
scope/rid so tests don't verify scoped checks; update the mocked function in
ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx (the jest.mock that defines
hasAtLeastOnePermission and uses mockGrantedPermissions) to accept the second
argument (scope) and validate that the granted entry includes the room id—either
by asserting scope === expectedRid when called or by encoding grants with a
composite key (e.g., `${scope}:${permission}`) and checking
mockGrantedPermissions for that composite, so the mock enforces room-scoped
permission checks used by ComposerPopupProvider.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bd8e36e6-3bf6-49c1-85df-5d74e2c09ac3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 097441b and 6571622.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
📜 Review details
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{ts,tsx,js}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/playwright.mdc)

**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Write concise, technical TypeScript/JavaScript with accurate typing in Playwright tests
Avoid code comments in the implementation

Files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
🧠 Learnings (18)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: smirk-dev
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39625
File: apps/meteor/app/api/server/v1/push.ts:85-97
Timestamp: 2026-03-14T14:58:58.834Z
Learning: In RocketChat/Rocket.Chat, the `push.token` POST/DELETE endpoints in `apps/meteor/app/api/server/v1/push.ts` were already migrated to the chained router API pattern on `develop` prior to PR `#39625`. `cleanTokenResult` (which strips `authToken` and returns `PushTokenResult`) and `isPushTokenPOSTProps`/`isPushTokenDELETEProps` validators already exist on `develop`. PR `#39625` only migrates `push.get` and `push.info` to the chained pattern. Do not flag `cleanTokenResult` or `PushTokenResult` as newly introduced behavior-breaking changes when reviewing this PR.
Learnt from: ggazzo
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 35995
File: apps/meteor/app/api/server/v1/rooms.ts:1107-1112
Timestamp: 2026-02-23T17:53:18.785Z
Learning: In Rocket.Chat PR reviews, maintain strict scope boundaries—when a PR is focused on a specific endpoint (e.g., rooms.favorite), avoid reviewing or suggesting changes to other endpoints that were incidentally refactored (e.g., rooms.invite) unless explicitly requested by maintainers.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-04T16:49:19.107Z
Learnt from: ricardogarim
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 37377
File: apps/meteor/ee/server/hooks/federation/index.ts:86-88
Timestamp: 2025-11-04T16:49:19.107Z
Learning: In Rocket.Chat's federation system (apps/meteor/ee/server/hooks/federation/), permission checks follow two distinct patterns: (1) User-initiated federation actions (creating rooms, adding users to federated rooms, joining from invites) should throw MeteorError to inform users they lack 'access-federation' permission. (2) Remote server-initiated federation events should silently skip/ignore when users lack permission. The beforeAddUserToRoom hook only executes for local user-initiated actions, so throwing an error there is correct. Remote federation events are handled separately by the federation Matrix package with silent skipping logic.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-03-11T22:04:20.529Z
Learnt from: juliajforesti
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39545
File: apps/meteor/client/views/room/body/hooks/useHasNewMessages.ts:59-61
Timestamp: 2026-03-11T22:04:20.529Z
Learning: In `apps/meteor/client/views/room/body/hooks/useHasNewMessages.ts`, the `msg.u._id === uid` early-return in the `streamNewMessage` handler is intentional: the "New messages" indicator is designed to notify about messages from other users only. Self-sent messages — including those sent from a different session/device — are always skipped, by design. Do not flag this as a multi-session regression.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-04-17T17:38:15.994Z
Learnt from: d-gubert
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39858
File: packages/ui-kit/src/interactions/UserInteraction.ts:33-33
Timestamp: 2026-04-17T17:38:15.994Z
Learning: In RocketChat/Rocket.Chat (`packages/ui-kit/src/interactions/UserInteraction.ts`), `ViewSubmitUserInteraction` and `ViewClosedUserInteraction` intentionally do NOT include `rid` when the interaction originates from a **modal** surface. Modals are not scoped to a room, so no room id is available in that context. The `rid?: string` field is optional to support the contextual bar surface (where room context exists) while remaining absent for modals. Do not flag the absence of `rid` in modal viewSubmit/viewClosed interactions as a missing-context bug.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-03-09T18:39:21.178Z
Learnt from: Harxhit
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39476
File: apps/meteor/server/methods/addAllUserToRoom.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-03-09T18:39:21.178Z
Learning: In apps/meteor/server/methods/addAllUserToRoom.ts, the implementation uses a single cursor pass (Users.find(userFilter).batchSize(100)) that collects both the full user objects (collectedUsers: IUser[]) and their usernames (usernames: string[]) in one iteration. `beforeAddUserToRoom` is then called once with the full usernames batch (preserving batch-validation semantics), and the subsequent subscription/message processing loop iterates over the same stable `collectedUsers` array — no second DB query is made. This avoids any race condition between validation and processing while preserving the original batch-validation behavior.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-03-27T14:52:56.865Z
Learnt from: dougfabris
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39892
File: apps/meteor/client/views/room/contextualBar/Threads/Thread.tsx:150-155
Timestamp: 2026-03-27T14:52:56.865Z
Learning: In Rocket.Chat, there are two different `ModalBackdrop` components with different prop APIs. During review, confirm the import source: (1) `rocket.chat/fuselage` `ModalBackdrop` uses `ModalBackdropProps` based on `BoxProps` (so it supports `onClick` and other Box/DOM props) and does not have an `onDismiss` prop; (2) `rocket.chat/ui-client` `ModalBackdrop` uses a narrower props interface like `{ children?: ReactNode; onDismiss?: () => void }` and handles Escape keypress and outside mouse-up, and it does not forward arbitrary DOM props such as `onClick`. Flag mismatched props (e.g., `onDismiss` passed to the fuselage component or `onClick` passed to the ui-client component) and ensure the usage matches the correct component being imported.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx
  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-12-10T21:00:54.909Z
Learnt from: KevLehman
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 37091
File: ee/packages/abac/jest.config.ts:4-7
Timestamp: 2025-12-10T21:00:54.909Z
Learning: Rocket.Chat monorepo: Jest testMatch pattern '<rootDir>/src/**/*.spec.(ts|js|mjs)' is valid in this repo and used across multiple packages (e.g., packages/tools, ee/packages/omnichannel-services). Do not flag it as invalid in future reviews.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-04-17T18:33:27.211Z
Learnt from: d-gubert
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39858
File: apps/meteor/tests/e2e/apps/uikit-interactions.spec.ts:123-151
Timestamp: 2026-04-17T18:33:27.211Z
Learning: In RocketChat/Rocket.Chat (`apps/meteor/tests/e2e/apps/uikit-interactions.spec.ts`), `executeBlockActionHandler` invocations originating from a **modal** surface intentionally do NOT include a `block_action_room` (room property) in the interaction payload. Modals are not scoped to a room, so no room id is available in that context. Do not flag the absence of a room assertion in the modal block-action test as a missing coverage bug; instead, document it explicitly with a `test.step` asserting the room entry is `undefined`.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/playwright.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learning: Applies to apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts : Utilize Playwright fixtures (`test`, `page`, `expect`) for consistency in test files

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/playwright.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learning: Applies to apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts : Maintain test isolation between test cases in Playwright tests

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/playwright.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learning: Applies to apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts : Use `expect` matchers for assertions (`toEqual`, `toContain`, `toBeTruthy`, `toHaveLength`, etc.) instead of `assert` statements in Playwright tests

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-02-24T19:36:55.089Z
Learnt from: juliajforesti
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 38493
File: apps/meteor/tests/e2e/page-objects/fragments/home-content.ts:60-82
Timestamp: 2026-02-24T19:36:55.089Z
Learning: In RocketChat/Rocket.Chat e2e tests (apps/meteor/tests/e2e/page-objects/fragments/home-content.ts), thread message preview listitems do not have aria-roledescription="message", so lastThreadMessagePreview locator cannot be scoped to messageListItems (which filters for aria-roledescription="message"). It should remain scoped to page.getByRole('listitem') or mainMessageList.getByRole('listitem').

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/playwright.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learning: Applies to apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts : Prefer web-first assertions (`toBeVisible`, `toHaveText`, etc.) in Playwright tests

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/playwright.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learning: Applies to apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts : Ensure tests run reliably in parallel without shared state conflicts

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/playwright.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learning: Applies to apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts : Ensure clean state for each test execution in Playwright tests

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/playwright.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T17:08:17.065Z
Learning: Applies to apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts : All test files must be created in `apps/meteor/tests/e2e/` directory

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-04-13T00:56:24.562Z
Learnt from: ricardogarim
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 40078
File: apps/meteor/tests/e2e/utils/getPermissionRoles.ts:4-6
Timestamp: 2026-04-13T00:56:24.562Z
Learning: In RocketChat/Rocket.Chat, the `getPermissionRoles` utility in `apps/meteor/tests/e2e/utils/getPermissionRoles.ts` intentionally returns an empty array (`[]`) when a permission is not found or has no roles, rather than throwing. This is by design: the helper is a general-purpose utility and individual tests are responsible for handling the empty-array case as appropriate for their scenario.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
📚 Learning: 2026-03-06T18:10:15.268Z
Learnt from: tassoevan
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39397
File: packages/gazzodown/src/code/CodeBlock.spec.tsx:47-68
Timestamp: 2026-03-06T18:10:15.268Z
Learning: In tests (especially those using testing-library/dom/jsdom) for Rocket.Chat components, the HTML <code> element has an implicit ARIA role of 'code'. Therefore, screen.getByRole('code') or screen.findByRole('code') will locate <code> elements even without a role attribute. Do not flag findByRole('code') as invalid in reviews; prefer using the implicit role instead of adding role="code" unless necessary for accessibility.

Applied to files:

  • apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.tsx (1)

97-130: Permission-gated special mentions look good.

@all and @here are now added only when their specific permission is granted for rid, while preserving the existing filter matching.

apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx (1)

74-101: Good coverage of the permission combinations.

The four cases clearly cover neither, each individual permission, and both permissions for the special mention entries.

Comment thread apps/meteor/client/views/room/providers/ComposerPopupProvider.spec.tsx Outdated
- Adds unit tests covering all permission combinations.
@ishanmitra
ishanmitra force-pushed the feat/show-all-here-user-permission branch from 6571622 to 6e4d0f0 Compare April 28, 2026 18:20
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot removed the type: feature Pull requests that introduces new feature label Apr 28, 2026
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot added the type: feature Pull requests that introduces new feature label Apr 28, 2026
mockGrantedPermissions.clear();
permissions.forEach((permission) => mockGrantedPermissions.add(`${room._id}:${permission}`));

const appRoot = mockAppRoot().build();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of mocking the permission module, i think you can use .withPermission() helper on the mockAppRoot

let popupOptions: ReturnType<typeof useComposerPopupOptions> | undefined;

render(
<FakeRoomProvider roomOverrides={room}>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here you might also be able to use the .withRoom() helper from mockAppRoot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have made implementation changes to ComposerPopupProvider so that it's possible to use .withPermission() and .withRoom()

@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 69.76%. Comparing base (f65cd9b) to head (fa42a41).
⚠️ Report is 77 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #40262      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    69.83%   69.76%   -0.07%     
===========================================
  Files         3296     3297       +1     
  Lines       119161   119744     +583     
  Branches     21476    21476              
===========================================
+ Hits         83211    83543     +332     
- Misses       32647    32907     +260     
+ Partials      3303     3294       -9     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 70.42% <100.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

…PopupProvider

- `hasAtLeastOnePermission`` reads Meteor reactive stores, bypassing `AuthorizationContext`
- `useAtLeastOnePermission` hook reads `AuthorizationContext`, which `mockAppRoot` controls
- spec can now use `.withPermission()` and `.withRoom()` instead of `jest.mock`
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot removed the type: feature Pull requests that introduces new feature label May 14, 2026
@ishanmitra
ishanmitra requested a review from MartinSchoeler May 15, 2026 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants