Skip to content

Conversation

@KevLehman
Copy link
Member

@KevLehman KevLehman commented Jul 9, 2025

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

https://rocketchat.atlassian.net/browse/CTZ-228

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

image

@dionisio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

dionisio-bot bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉
If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 9, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d9210ec

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@KevLehman KevLehman changed the base branch from develop to feat/CTZ-182 July 9, 2025 19:43
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 9, 2025

PR Preview Action v1.6.2

🚀 View preview at
https://RocketChat.github.io/Rocket.Chat/pr-preview/pr-36390/

Built to branch gh-pages at 2025-07-19 03:03 UTC.
Preview will be ready when the GitHub Pages deployment is complete.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 65.68%. Comparing base (0b4f3d3) to head (d9210ec).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #36390      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    65.72%   65.68%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files         3174     3174              
  Lines       105823   105829       +6     
  Branches     20069    20070       +1     
===========================================
- Hits         69549    69516      -33     
- Misses       33607    33638      +31     
- Partials      2667     2675       +8     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 58.08% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
unit 70.82% <0.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Base automatically changed from feat/CTZ-182 to develop July 10, 2025 13:37
@KevLehman KevLehman force-pushed the feat/app-bridge-outbound branch 2 times, most recently from 55d324e to a154a0c Compare July 14, 2025 14:44
@KevLehman KevLehman marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2025 16:46
@KevLehman KevLehman requested review from a team as code owners July 16, 2025 16:46
@KevLehman KevLehman requested a review from sampaiodiego July 19, 2025 02:16
@sampaiodiego sampaiodiego added stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider and removed stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider labels Jul 19, 2025
@sampaiodiego sampaiodiego added this to the 7.9.0 milestone Jul 19, 2025
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added the stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge label Jul 19, 2025
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit fccb537 into develop Jul 19, 2025
49 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the feat/app-bridge-outbound branch July 19, 2025 03:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants