Skip to content

Conversation

@yash-rajpal
Copy link
Member

@yash-rajpal yash-rajpal commented May 9, 2025

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

CORE-1146

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments


Description

This pull request addresses an issue in the Rocket.Chat repository where the Prune Messages form was not resetting properly. The changes involve refactoring the checkbox handling within the PruneMessages.tsx file. Specifically, the form has been updated to use the Controller component from react-hook-form instead of the register API. This change improves the integration with controlled CheckBox components and centralizes the form state management through the control object. The update aims to ensure that the form resets correctly and functions as expected.

@dionisio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

dionisio-bot bot commented May 9, 2025

Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉
If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 9, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: d14cf19

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 36 packages
Name Type
@rocket.chat/meteor Patch
@rocket.chat/core-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/rest-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client Patch
@rocket.chat/apps Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services Patch
@rocket.chat/cron Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client Patch
@rocket.chat/freeswitch Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit Patch
@rocket.chat/gazzodown Patch
@rocket.chat/livechat Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts Patch
@rocket.chat/account-service Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service Patch
@rocket.chat/license Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/presence Patch
rocketchat-services Patch
@rocket.chat/models Patch
@rocket.chat/network-broker Patch
@rocket.chat/mock-providers Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-client Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-voip Patch
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@kody-ai
Copy link

kody-ai bot commented May 9, 2025

Code Review Completed! 🔥

The code review was successfully completed based on your current configurations.

Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration
Interacting with Kody
  • Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the @kody start-review command at the root of your PR.

  • Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Current Kody Configuration
Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options Enabled
Security
Code Style
Kody Rules
Refactoring
Error Handling
Maintainability
Potential Issues
Documentation And Comments
Performance And Optimization
Breaking Changes

Access your configuration settings here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2025

PR Preview Action v1.6.1

🚀 View preview at
https://RocketChat.github.io/Rocket.Chat/pr-preview/pr-35962/

Built to branch gh-pages at 2025-05-14 12:55 UTC.
Preview will be ready when the GitHub Pages deployment is complete.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.72%. Comparing base (78cbade) to head (d14cf19).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #35962      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    64.70%   64.72%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         3244     3247       +3     
  Lines        95356    95433      +77     
  Branches     17884    17909      +25     
===========================================
+ Hits         61704    61770      +66     
- Misses       30761    30765       +4     
- Partials      2891     2898       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 58.42% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
unit 71.91% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@yash-rajpal yash-rajpal marked this pull request as ready for review May 12, 2025 13:32
@yash-rajpal yash-rajpal requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2025 13:32
@cardoso cardoso added this to the 7.7.0 milestone May 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@aleksandernsilva aleksandernsilva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good fix, Yash. If it's not yet the case, I believe it would be a good idea to add tests to cover this feature.

Also, could you add a changeset and steps to reproduce to the PR?

@cardoso
Copy link
Member

cardoso commented May 12, 2025

@aleksandernsilva I'm writing tests for this 👍

@cardoso cardoso self-requested a review May 12, 2025 21:14
cardoso
cardoso previously approved these changes May 12, 2025
Copy link
Member

@cardoso cardoso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, I did some QA and added the tests @aleksandernsilva asked for.

@cardoso cardoso added the stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider label May 12, 2025
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added the stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge label May 12, 2025
@cardoso cardoso requested a review from aleksandernsilva May 12, 2025 21:19
@kody-ai
Copy link

kody-ai bot commented May 12, 2025

Code Review Completed! 🔥

The code review was successfully completed based on your current configurations.

Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration
Interacting with Kody
  • Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the @kody start-review command at the root of your PR.

  • Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Current Kody Configuration
Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options Enabled
Security
Code Style
Kody Rules
Refactoring
Error Handling
Maintainability
Potential Issues
Documentation And Comments
Performance And Optimization
Breaking Changes

Access your configuration settings here.

@kody-ai
Copy link

kody-ai bot commented May 14, 2025

Kody Review Complete

Great news! 🎉
No issues were found that match your current review configurations.

Keep up the excellent work! 🚀

Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration
Interacting with Kody
  • Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the @kody start-review command at the root of your PR.

  • Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Current Kody Configuration
Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options Enabled
Security
Code Style
Kody Rules
Refactoring
Error Handling
Maintainability
Potential Issues
Documentation And Comments
Performance And Optimization
Breaking Changes

Access your configuration settings here.

@kody-ai
Copy link

kody-ai bot commented May 14, 2025

Code Review Completed! 🔥

The code review was successfully completed based on your current configurations.

Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration
Interacting with Kody
  • Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the @kody start-review command at the root of your PR.

  • Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Current Kody Configuration
Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options Enabled
Security
Code Style
Kody Rules
Refactoring
Error Handling
Maintainability
Potential Issues
Documentation And Comments
Performance And Optimization
Breaking Changes

Access your configuration settings here.

@kody-ai
Copy link

kody-ai bot commented May 14, 2025

Code Review Completed! 🔥

The code review was successfully completed based on your current configurations.

Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration
Interacting with Kody
  • Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the @kody start-review command at the root of your PR.

  • Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Current Kody Configuration
Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options Enabled
Security
Code Style
Kody Rules
Refactoring
Error Handling
Maintainability
Potential Issues
Documentation And Comments
Performance And Optimization
Breaking Changes

Access your configuration settings here.

Copy link
Member

@cardoso cardoso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit abe8320 into develop May 14, 2025
48 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the prune-messages-not-resetting branch May 14, 2025 15:37
ahmed-n-abdeltwab pushed a commit to ahmed-n-abdeltwab/Rocket.Chat that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants