regression: desambiguate manually app routes

[Gustrb]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Since #34999 we removed the restivus router, that would do a bit of work to match the routes based on a tree (match on leafs). Now, since that was replaced by express, which uses a dumber route matcher algorithm, we must do the desambiguation of routes manually.

Example

Let's say we have a route apps/:id
And later we define a route apps/data

If the one fetches apps/data, the router will match as if the user desired to go to apps/:id with the id being "data"

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

CONN-511

[dionisio-bot]

Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉
If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 01728b3

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 59.22%. Comparing base (fcbdcd1) to head (01728b3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #35145   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    59.22%   59.22%           
========================================
  Files         2824     2824           
  Lines        67980    67980           
  Branches     15117    15117           
========================================
  Hits         40259    40259           
  Misses       24892    24892           
  Partials      2829     2829           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	75.17% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.