[FIX] Normalize Thread Messages - #20842
Closed
aKn1ghtOut wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Member
|
how this compares to #20634 ? |
Member
|
Missing the normalization on REST APIs and on |
Member
|
I think this is a duplicate of #20634 |
Contributor
Author
|
The other PR author was going about it a different way before, and perceived it to be a different issue. I think he's now implementing the changes as prescribed right now. |
Member
|
Hi there, thanks for the contribution! 🚀 💯 Closing this PR because it's stale now and it was already fixed here: #30069 Questions? Help needed? Feature Requests?
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)
The
getThreadMessagesfunction was not using the normalize function, which adds the real names to the reactions in accordance with theUse Real Namesetting. Added that. Now, the function works as expected.Before:
Now:
Issue(s)
Closes #20841
Steps to test or reproduce
Further comments